FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 296:1088-1092 May 12, 1977 Number 19 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

We used decision analysis to explore the role of lymphangiography for staging Hodgkin's disease. Factors included were status of the patient before the test, accuracy and mortality of lymphangiography, mortality of laparotomy and effectiveness of selected treatment. We analyzed hypothetical cases with varying probabilities being in Stages I+II, III and IV to determine the population in which indication for laparotomy would depend upon results of lymphangiography. Calculations made for asymptomatic patients revealed that the diagnostic usefulness of lymphangiography is restricted to patients either with a relatively low probability of Stage IV or with a very high probability of Stage IV disease. This population is further restricted as false-positive and false-negative results of lymphangiography increase.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hartz, A., Centor, R. (1986). Measures of the Value of a Diagnostic Test Derived from Stochastic Thresholds. Med Decis Making 6: 149-153 [Abstract]  
• Greenes, R. A., Cain, K. C., Begg, C. B. (1984). Patient-Oriented Performance Measures of Diagnostic Tests: 1. Tools for Prospective Evaluation of Test Order Decisions. Med Decis Making 4: 7-15