FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 296:1258-1264 June 2, 1977 Number 22 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

General medical journals seek newsworthiness but face obstacles because of their usually slow publication schedules and because of contents that readers find either obscure or contradictory to long held beliefs. In addition, since medical news has become "big news," general medical journals find themselves in competition with both the lay press and the medical giveaways. One effect of the escalating public interest in medical news is that general medical journals that are reliable and have maintained their newsworthiness are increasingly cited. These journals thus eventually transmit research findings to the public as well as to the health-care professions. To help prevent exaggeration and misinterpretation by the lay press and by the public, general medical journals must evaluate submissions in a broader than traditional context. Nevertheless, newsworthiness is an appropiate goal for such journals.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bressler, N. M., Liesegang, T. J., Schachat, A. P., Albert, D. M. (2004). Advantages and Potential Dangers of Presentation Before Publication: Third in a Series on Editorship. Arch Ophthalmol 122: 1045-1048 [Full Text]  
• Fontanarosa, P. B., Flanagin, A., DeAngelis, C. D. (2000). THE JOURNAL's Policy Regarding Release of Information to the Public. JAMA 284: 2929-2931 [Full Text]  
• Winker, M. A., Fontanarosa, P. B. (1999). JAMA-EXPRESS: Rapid Peer Review and Publication. JAMA 281: 1754-1755 [Full Text]  
• Johnson, T. (1998). Medicine and the Media. NEJM 339: 87-92 [Full Text]