FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 299:522-524 September 7, 1978 Number 10 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

We reviewed the birth certificates and hospital records of 7723 infants those mothers had reported using oral contraceptives. The overall frequency of malformation was 4.3 per cent for infants whose mothers terminated use of oral contraceptives shortly before conception, as compared with 3.3 per cent for infants whose mothers did not take oral conceptives diring the three years before conception. The 90 per cent confidence limits for the prevalence ratio were 1.0 and 1.7. No difference was apparent for major malformations. For specific malformations the most notable difference was for undescented testis, but this excess, like the overall excess, could be explained by sampling variability. Despite the slightly greater rate of minor malformations in the short-interval group, a reasonable interpretation of these data would be that oral contraceptives present no major teratogenic hazard.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Coleman, M. P (2007). Commentary: Is epidemiology really dead, anyway? * A look back at Kenneth Rothman's 'The rise and fall of epidemiology, 1950 2000 AD'. Int J Epidemiol 36: 719-723 [Full Text]