FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 303:71-76 July 10, 1980 Number 2 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

CL Bosk Abstract

The social practices surrounding diagnosis and management decisions are analyzed from a sociological perspective as occupational rituals. These rituals are part of rounds and conferences, and they assist physicians in managing uncertainty, making treatment decisions, and evaluating outcomes. Physicians use eight key strategies to manage uncertainty: hedged assertions, probability reasoning, a focus on uncertainty as a research problem, requests for consultations, Socratic teaching, deciding not to decide, gallows humor, and hyperrealism. Clinical experience and scientific evidence are used in treatment decisions. The manner in which decisions are made at rounds allows physicians to dramatize the seriousness with which they take their responsibilities to patients. Two major rituals for evaluating outcomes of treatment decisions, grand rounds and the mortality and morbidity conference, provide a forum for dramatizing success and failure, respectively. Occupational rituals allow physicians to discuss their problems. The capacity of modern medicine to process clinical data threatens to obviate these rituals.

CL Bosk

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Guru, V., Tu, J. V., Etchells, E., Anderson, G. M., Naylor, C. D., Novick, R. J., Feindel, C. M., Rubens, F. D., Teoh, K., Mathur, A., Hamilton, A., Bonneau, D., Cutrara, C., Austin, P. C., Fremes, S. E. (2008). Relationship Between Preventability of Death After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and All-Cause Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates. Circulation 117: 2969-2976 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mueller, P. S., Segovis, C. M., Litin, S. C., Habermann, T. M., Parrino, T. A. (2006). Current Status of Medical Grand Rounds in Departments of Medicine at US Medical Schools. Mayo Clin Proc. 81: 313-321 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ness, D. E. (2002). Discussing Treatment Options and Risks With Medical Patients Who Have Psychiatric Problems. Arch Intern Med 162: 2037-2044 [Full Text]  
• Baerheim, A. (2001). The diagnostic process in general practice: has it a two-phase structure?. Fam Pract 18: 243-245 [Full Text]  
• Christakis, N. A., Iwashyna, T. J. (1998). Attitude and Self-reported Practice Regarding Prognostication in a National Sample of Internists. Arch Intern Med 158: 2389-2395 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McConnochie, K. M., Roghmann, K. J., Kitzman, H. J., Liptak, G. S., McBride, J. T. (1997). Ensuring High-Quality Alternatives While Ending Pediatric Inpatient Care as We Know It. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 151: 341-349 [Abstract]  
• Laine, C., Davidoff, F. (1996). Patient-Centered Medicine: A Professional Evolution. JAMA 275: 152-156 [Abstract]  
• Poses, R. M., Bekes, C., Winkler, R. L., Scott, W. E., Copare, F. J. (1990). Are Two (Inexperienced) Heads Better Than One (Experienced) Head? Averaging House Officers' Prognostic Judgments for Critically Ill Patients. Arch Intern Med 150: 1874-1878 [Abstract]  
• Goldman, G. M. (1990). Judgmental Error in Intensive Care Practice. J Intensive Care Med 5: 93-103 [Abstract]  
• Reames, H. R. Jr, Dunstone, D. C. (1989). Professional Satisfaction of Physicians. Arch Intern Med 149: 1951-1956 [Abstract]  
• Parrino, T. A., Villanueva, A. G. (1986). The Principles and Practice of Morning Report. JAMA 256: 730-733 [Abstract]  
• SCHAFFER, W. A., HOLLOMAN, F. C. Jr. (1985). Consultation and Referral Between Physicians in New Medical Practice Environments. ANN INTERN MED 103: 600-605 [Abstract]