FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 304:925-929 April 16, 1981 Number 16 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

To determine whether routine early endoscopy is beneficial to patients with upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding that ceases during hospitalization, we randomly assigned 206 patients to routine endoscopy (100 patients) or no routine endoscopy (106). Patients in the latter group underwent endoscopy only if recurrent bleeding occurred during hospitalization or if x-ray films disclosed gastric ulcer or suggested neoplasia. All patients were initially treated with an empiric antacid regimen. When the two groups were compared (experimental versus control), there were no significant differences in overall hospital deaths (11 versus eight), recurrence of bleeding (33 versus 32), number of transfusions required to treat recurrent bleeding (mean +/- S.E.M., 7.4 +/- 1.2 versus 6.3 +/- 0.7 units), deaths after recurrent bleeding (eight versus five), or duration of hospital stay. During the 12 months after discharge, there were also no significant differences in frequency of readmission to the hospital, incidence of further gastrointestinal bleeding, number of hemorrhage-related deaths, or frequency of gastrointestinal surgery. We conclude that endoscopy should not be a routine procedure in patients with upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding that ceases during treatment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Spiegel, B. M. R., Vakil, N. B., Ofman, J. J. (2001). Endoscopy for Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Hemorrhage: Is Sooner Better?: A Systematic Review. Arch Intern Med 161: 1393-1404 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laine, L., Peterson, W. L. (1994). Bleeding Peptic Ulcer. NEJM 331: 717-727 [Full Text]