The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 305:727-731 September 24, 1981 Number 13
NextNext

The role of maintenance therapy in disseminated testicular cancer
LH Einhorn, SD Williams, M Troner, R Birch, and FA Greco

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Abstract

We concluded a prospective study of the value of maintenance therapy in disseminated testicular cancer after chemotherapy-induced complete remission or chemotherapy cytoreduction followed by surgical resection of residual teratoma. A group of 171 patients were randomized to treatment consisting of cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin, or these drugs plus doxorubicin. There was no apparent difference between these two induction regimens. Complete remission was achieved in 113 patients (66 per cent), and 19 (11 per cent) were free of disease by surgical resection of residual tumor. Of the 171 who started, 113 were eligible to receive either maintenance doses of vinblastine (58 patients) or no further therapy (55 patients) after remission-induction therapy. There was a 9 per cent relapse rate during maintenance with vinblastine and a 7 per cent relapse rate with no maintenance therapy; the overall relapse rate was 8 per cent (nine of 113). Our data indicate that maintenance therapy is unnecessary in disseminated testicular cancer.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.