To evaluate the use of antibiotics given prophylactically of colon surgery, we examined 26 trials published from 1965 to 1980 in which patients given various antibiotic regiments were compared with controls given no antibiotic treatment. In 22 (85 per cent of these trials) antibiotics reduced postoperative wound infection (p less than 0.05 in 14). Combining the results of the trials published from 1965 to 1975 reveals a 95 per cent confidence interval from the true difference in infection rates of 14 +/- 6 per cent (36 per cent for control group vs. 22 per cent for treatment group) and the true difference in death rates of 6.7 +/- 4.4 per cent (11.2 per cent for control group vs 4.5 per cent for treatment group). Yet trials employing control groups given no treatment continue to be reported. Since the use of such controls is justified only when no effective alternative therapy exists, we believe that any further trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery should employ a previously proved standard. However, steadily increasing efficacy of treatment means that comparisons of new therapies with standard therapies will become prohibitively expensive because of the large number of patients required.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Fujita, S., Saito, N., Yamada, T., Takii, Y., Kondo, K., Ohue, M., Ikeda, E., Moriya, Y.
(2007). Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Single Dose vs 3 Doses of a Second-Generation Cephalosporin Without Metronidazole and Oral Antibiotics. Arch Surg
142: 657-661
[Abstract][Full Text]
Togo, S., Tanaka, K., Matsuo, K., Nagano, Y., Ueda, M., Morioka, D., Endo, I., Shimada, H.
(2007). Duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial using flomoxef. J Antimicrob Chemother
59: 964-970
[Abstract][Full Text]
Valverde, A., Hay, J.-M., Fingerhut, A., Boudet, M.-J., Petroni, R., Pouliquen, X., Msika, S., Flamant, Y., for the French Association for Surgical Research,
(1999). Senna vs Polyethylene Glycol for Mechanical Preparation the Evening Before Elective Colonic or Rectal Resection: A Multicenter Controlled Trial. Arch Surg
134: 514-519
[Abstract][Full Text]
Martin, C., Cotin, A., Giraud, A., Beccani-Argème, M., Alliot, P., Mallet, M.-N., Argème, M.
(1998). Comparison of Concentrations of Sulbactam-Ampicillin Administered by Bolus Injections or Bolus plus Continuous Infusion in Tissues of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42: 1093-1097
[Abstract][Full Text]
Merad, F., Yahchouchi, E., Hay, J.-M., Fingerhut, A., Laborde, Y., Langlois-Zantain, O., for the French Associations for Surgical Research,
(1998). Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage After Elective Colonic Resection and Suprapromontory Anastomosis: A Multicenter Study Controlled by Randomization. Arch Surg
133: 309-314
[Abstract][Full Text]
Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I.
(1998). Moderator Search in Meta-Analysis: A Review and Cautionary Note on Existing Approaches. Educational and Psychological Measurement
58: 77-87
[Abstract]
Savulescu, J., Chalmers, I., Blunt, J.
(1996). Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability. BMJ
313: 1390-1393
[Full Text]
Schmidt, F., Hunter, J. E.
(1995). The Impact of Data-Analysis Methods on Cumulative Research Knowledge: Statistical Significance Testing, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. Eval Health Prof
18: 408-427
[Abstract]
Harvard, T. C., Lau, J.
(1993). Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials. Stat Methods Med Res
2: 161-172
[Abstract]
Previous
