FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 305:253-259 July 30, 1981 Number 5 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

The Reagan administration has proposed a three-year phase-out of the Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) program. The resulting debate in the 97th Congress is focusing on conservatives' concerns that the program represents an intrusion into medical practice rather than liberals' fears that physician-based organizations will not conduct rigorous review. There are three possible future directions for PSROs: rapid elimination through budget cuts; retention of some PSROs at current budget levels, which would essentially mean slow starvation; or retention of some PSROs, with major changes in their relation to the federal government. Multiple sources of funding and a linkage of local PSRO budgets to local effectiveness could further enhance the performance of the best PSROs. As national mechanisms of health-care financing change, the role of PSROs should also change; there is a central place for physician-based review in "pro-competitive" health-care-financing systems.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Snyder, C., Anderson, G. (2005). Do Quality Improvement Organizations Improve the Quality of Hospital Care for Medicare Beneficiaries?. JAMA 293: 2900-2907 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Korda, H. (1994). Utilization Review for Medicaid Diagnosis-Related Group Systems: Practice, Innovation and Lessons of Experience. American Journal of Medical Quality 9: 54-67 [Abstract]  
• Hayes, R. P., Lundberg, M. T., Ballard, D. J. (1994). Peer Review Organizations: Scientific Challenges in HCFA's Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative. Med Care Res Rev 51: 39-60  
• Detmer, D. E., Frisch, C. (1984). Improved Results in Acute Appendicitis Care Following Areawide Review. Med Decis Making 4: 217-227