FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 306:333-339 February 11, 1982 Number 6 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

To help curb excessive radiography, we developed a protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-ray examination, and we tested the protocol prospectively in 848 patients to determine its safety and effectiveness. Strict adherence to the protocol would have reduced x-ray usage by 12 per cent for upper extremities and 19 per cent for lower extremities. The actual reductions were 5 per cent and 16 per cent, respectively, since further reductions were limited by patient's demands for x-ray examinations. One fracture in 287 were missed, but the treatment was appropriate and the outcome satisfactory. By eliminating superfluous x-ray procedures, the protocol could reduce charges by $79 million to $139 million nationwide, without compromising quality of care or increasing malpractice liability. Nevertheless, even the best protocol cannot eliminate all negative x-ray studies. These results should serve as a stimulus for judicious use of radiography, but also as a warning to avoid overzealous cost-containment strategies that would reduce x-ray usage to below a safe threshold.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Webster, A P, Goodacre, S, Walker, D, Burke, D (2006). How do clinical features help identify paediatric patients with fractures following blunt wrist trauma?. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 354-357 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reilly, B. M., Evans, A. T. (2006). Translating Clinical Research into Clinical Practice: Impact of Using Prediction Rules To Make Decisions. ANN INTERN MED 144: 201-209 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bachmann, L. M, Kolb, E., Koller, M. T, Steurer, J., ter Riet, G. (2003). Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ 326: 417-417 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Papacostas, E, Malliaropoulos, N, Papadopoulos, A, Liouliakis, C (2001). Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic. Br. J. Sports. Med. 35: 445-447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brandser, E. A., Berbaum, K. S., Dorfman, D. D., Braksiek, R. J., El-Khoury, G. Y., Saltzman, C. L., Marsh, J. L., Clark, W. A. (2000). Contribution of Individual Projections Alone and in Combination for Radiographic Detection of Ankle Fractures. Am. J. Roentgenol. 174: 1691-1697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stiell, I., Wells, G., Laupacis, A., Brison, R., Verbeek, R., Vandemheen, K., Naylor, C D. (1995). Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. BMJ 311: 594-597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Diehr, P., Highley, R., Dehkordi, F., Wood, R., Krueger, L., Teitz, C., Hermanson, B. (1988). Prediction of Fracture in Patients with Acute MusculosKeletal Ankle Trauma. Med Decis Making 8: 40-47 [Abstract]