FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 307:855-862 September 30, 1982 Number 14 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

The use of skilled-nursing facilities by Medicare beneficiaries as measured in days of care per thousand elderly persons varies considerably from one state to another. To explore the possibility that this variation reflects differences in the administrative interpretation of rules governing coverage, we developed nine hypothetical cases and presented them by telephone to claims reviewers in fiscal intermediaries and professional standards review organizations. Cases were designed to illuminate the reviewers' use of discretion. We observed marked differences both in the reviewers' decisions to cover or not cover patients and in the reasoning behind their decisions. Three of the 18 reviewers decided to cover very few cases; almost half the reviewers decided to cover most of the cases, but not the same ones. In only two cases did the 18 reviewers approach consensus. This variation is a reflection of the complexity of Medicare's coverage rules and its decentralized administration. To reduce variation, we recommend more centralized review with oversight by Medicare's central office rather than by its 10 regional offices. This oversight should include the training of reviewers in a way that focuses on complex cases to improve the consistency of judgment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kane, R. L. (1997). Commentary. Med Care Res Rev 54: 321-325  
• Ulli, R. M. (1995). Resident Selection in a Connecticut Nursing Home: A Hew from within. J Aging Health 7: 139-159 [Abstract]  
• Benjamin, A.E. (1989). Perspectives on a Continuum of Care for Persons with HIV Illnesses. Med Care Res Rev 46: 411-437