FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 309:709-713 September 22, 1983 Number 12 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

A sorting of the statistical methods used by authors of the 760 research and review articles in Volumes 298 to 301 of The New England Journal of Medicine indicates that a reader who is conversant with descriptive statistics (percentages, means, and standard deviations) has statistical access to 58 per cent of the articles. Understanding t-tests increases this access to 67 per cent. The addition of contingency tables gives statistical access to 73 per cent of the articles. Familiarity with each additional statistical method gradually increases the percentage of accessible articles. Original Articles use statistical techniques more extensively than other articles in the Journal. Research studies based on a longitudinal design make heavier use of statistics than do those using a cross-sectional design. The tabulations in this study should aid clinicians and medical investigators who are planning their continuing education in statistical methods, and faculty who design or teach courses in quantitative methods for medical and health professionals.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Merrill, R. M., Lindsay, C. A., Shields, E. C., Stoddard, J. (2007). Perspective: Have the Focus and Sophistication of Research in Health Education Changed?. Health Educ Behav 34: 10-25 [Abstract]  
• Novack, L, Jotkowitz, A, Knyazer, B, Novack, V (2006). Evidence-based medicine: assessment of knowledge of basic epidemiological and research methods among medical doctors. Postgrad. Med. J. 82: 817-822 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shaneyfelt, T., Baum, K. D., Bell, D., Feldstein, D., Houston, T. K., Kaatz, S., Whelan, C., Green, M. (2006). Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review.. JAMA 296: 1116-1127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Horton, N. J., Switzer, S. S. (2005). Statistical methods in the journal.. NEJM 353: 1977-1979 [Full Text]  
• Lee, C. M, Soin, H. K, Einarson, T. R (2004). Statistics in the Pharmacy Literature. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38: 1412-1418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Olsen, C. H. (2003). Review of the Use of Statistics in Infection and Immunity. Infect. Immun. 71: 6689-6692 [Full Text]  
• Rushton, L. (2000). Reporting of occupational and environmental research: use and misuse of statistical and epidemiological methods. Occup. Environ. Med. 57: 1-9 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vandenplas, Y., Lifshitz, J. Z., Orenstein, S., Lifschitz, C. H., Shepherd, R. W., Casaubon, P. R., Muinos, W. I., Fagundes-Neto, U., Garcia Aranda, J. A., Gentles, M., Santiago, J. D., Vanderhoof, J., Yeung, C.-Y., Roberto Moran, J., Lifshitz, F. (1998). Nutritional Management of Regurgitation in Infants. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 17: 308-316 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wang, Q., Zhang, B. (1998). Research Design and Statistical Methods in Chinese Medical Journals. JAMA 280: 283-285 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Najean, Y., Rain, J.-D. (1997). Treatment of Polycythemia Vera: Use of 32P Alone or in Combination With Maintenance Therapy Using Hydroxyurea in 461 Patients Greater Than 65 Years of Age. Blood 89: 2319-2327 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ottenbacher, K. J. (1993). The Interpretation of Averages in Health Professions Research: An Empirical Examination. Eval Health Prof 16: 333-341 [Abstract]  
• Brown, G. W., Hayden, G. F. (1985). Nonparametric Methods: Clinical Applications. CLIN PEDIATR 24: 490-498 [Abstract]