The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 310:1089-1093 April 26, 1984 Number 17
NextNext

Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. When do physicians talk with patients?
SE Bedell, and TL Delbanco

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Abstract

We studied the extent to which 82 private physicians and 75 house officers talked with hospitalized patients or their families (or both) about whether they would desire cardiopulmonary resuscitation if it became necessary. During the period of study (1981), 154 patients were resuscitated at our university teaching hospital. In 68 per cent of the cases, physicians had formed an opinion about the patient's attitude toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, only 30 (19 per cent) of the patients had discussed resuscitation before the arrest with either their private physician or a house officer (or both); 51 (33 per cent) of the families were consulted. These percentages did not differ significantly according to the underlying disease, whether the patient was on the general wards or in the intensive-care unit, the physician's estimate of the probability of arrest, or the physician's level of training. Even the 151 physicians who believed that patients should participate in decisions about resuscitation, actually discussed the issue with their patients only rarely. We interviewed the 24 competent patients who survived cardiopulmonary resuscitation, to compare their actual attitudes about resuscitation with their physicians' opinions about their attitudes. The physician's opinion about a patient's desire for resuscitation correlated only weakly with the preference expressed by the patient. We suggest that physicians and patients consider the benefit of open discussion about cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.