The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 310:1150-1155 May 3, 1984 Number 18
NextNext

Ventilatory support by pacing of the conditioned diaphragm in quadriplegia
WW Glenn, JF Hogan, JS Loke, TE Ciesielski, ML Phelps, and R Rowedder

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Abstract

We provided full-time ventilatory support in five patients with respiratory paralysis accompanying quadriplegia by continuous electrical pacing of both hemidiaphragms simultaneously for 11 to 33 months through the application to the phrenic nerves of a low-frequency stimulus. The strength and endurance of the diaphragm muscle increased with pacing. Biopsy specimens taken from two patients who had uninterrupted stimulation for 6 and 16 weeks showed changes suggestive of the development of fatigue-resistant muscle fibers. When we compared these results with those of our earlier experience with intermittent unilateral stimulation of the diaphragm in 17 patients with respiratory paralysis, we found that continuous bilateral pacing using low-frequency stimulation appeared to be superior because of more efficient ventilation of both lungs, fewer total coulombs required to effect the same ventilation, and absence of myopathic changes in the diaphragm muscle. For patients with respiratory paralysis and intact phrenic nerves, continuous simultaneous pacing of both hemidiaphragms with low-frequency stimulation and a slow respiratory rate is a satisfactory method of providing full-time ventilatory support.

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.