FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 310:1231-1237 May 10, 1984 Number 19 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

To gain insight into the possible consequences of prospective payment for university hospitals, we studied 2025 admissions to the faculty and community services of a university hospital, measuring differences in case mix, costs, and mortality in the hospital. The faculty service had more of the patients with costly diagnoses, but even after adjustment for diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), costs were 11 per cent higher on the faculty service (95 per cent confidence limits, 4 to 18 per cent). The percentage differential was greatest for diagnostic costs. The differential was particularly large--70 per cent (95 per cent confidence limits, 33 to 107 per cent)--for patients with a predicted probability of death of 0.25 or greater. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower on the faculty service after adjustment for case mix and patient characteristics (P less than 0.05); the difference was particularly large for patients in the high-death-risk category. Comparison of a matched sample of 51 pairs of admissions from the high-death-risk category confirmed the above results with respect to costs and in-hospital mortality, but follow-up revealed that the survival rates were equal for the two services at nine months after discharge. The effect of prospective payment on the cost of care will be closely watched; we conclude that is will also be important to monitor the effect on outcomes, including hospital mortality rates.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• International Working Party to Promote and Revital, (2004). Academic medicine: the evidence base. BMJ 329: 789-792 [Full Text]  
• Bellet, P. S., Whitaker, R. C. (2000). Evaluation of a Pediatric Hospitalist Service: Impact on Length of Stay and Hospital Charges. Pediatrics 105: 478-484 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Taylor, D. H., Whellan, D. J., Sloan, F. A. (1999). Effects of Admission to a Teaching Hospital on the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries. NEJM 340: 293-299 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• BACH, P. B., CARSON, S. S., LEFF, A. (1998). Outcomes and Resource Utilization for Patients with Prolonged Critical Illness Managed by University-based or Community-based Subspecialists. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 158: 1410-1415 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Samuels, B. N., Novack, A. H., Martin, D. P., Connell, F. A. (1998). Comparison of Length of Stay for Asthma by Hospital Type. Pediatrics 101 : e13-e13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Badgett;, J. T., First, L. (1998). General Pediatric Teaching Clinics and Managed Care. Pediatrics 101: 775-778 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wall, T. C., Fargason Jr, C. A., Johnson, V. A. (1997). Comparison of Inpatient Charges Between Academic and Nonacademic Services in a Children's Hospital. Pediatrics 99: 175-179 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Flood, A. B. (1994). The Impact of Organizational and Managerial Factors on the Quality of Care in Health Care Organizations. Med Care Res Rev 51: 381-428  
• Fleming, S. T. (1990). The Relationship between the Cost and Quality of Hospital Care: A Review of the Literature. Med Care Res Rev 47: 487-502  
• Siegler, M., Shiedermayer, D. L. (1987). Should Fluid and Nutritional Support Be Withheld from Terminally Ill Patients?: Tube feeding in hospice settings. AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 4: 32-35  
• Wachtel, T., Moulton, A. W., Pezzullo, J., Hamolsky, M. (1986). Inpatient Management Protocols to Reduce Health Care Costs. Med Decis Making 6: 101-107 [Abstract]