We analyzed the records of 454,668 births in Ontario in the years 1979 to 1982 and found that the cesarean birth rate increased from 16.5 per hundred deliveries in 1979 to 18.7 in 1982. Cesarean births were classified according to four indications: previous cesarean birth, breech presentation, dystocia, and fetal distress. The increase in the cesarean rate for each indication from 1979 to 1982 was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the total rate increase. Previous cesarean births accounted for 68 per cent of the increase, breech presentation for 14 per cent, dystocia for 4 per cent, and fetal distress for 14 per cent. The impact of previous cesarean births was indicated by an increase in the number of women presenting with this indication--from 5.8 to 7.8 per cent of all deliveries. Although the incidence of breech presentation remained stable, the cesarean birth rate increased from 54.8 to 65 per cent for this indication. There were no marked changes in either the incidence of or cesarean rates for dystocia. The incidence of fetal distress doubled (2.4 to 4.7 per cent of deliveries), but the rate of cesarean births in these cases fell from 50.5 to 32.7 per cent. These findings suggest that physicians may have begun to respond to rising professional and public concern over the increasing cesarean birth rate, but major advances in controlling this rate can be achieved only by addressing the question of vaginal deliveries for some patients who have previously had cesarean section.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Xirasagar, S., Lin, H.-C., Liu, T.-C.
(2006). Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.. Health Policy Plan
21: 319-325
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lin, H.-C., Xirasagar, S., Tung, Y.-C.
(2006). Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
60: 522-526
[Abstract][Full Text]
Anderson, G. M
(2004). Making sense of rising caesarean section rates. BMJ
329: 696-697
[Full Text]
Librero, J., Peiró, S., Calderón, S. M.
(2000). Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
54: 631-636
[Abstract][Full Text]
Studnicki, J., Remmel, R., Campbell, R., Werner, D. C.
(1997). The Impact of Legislatively Imposed Practice Guidelines on Cesarean Section Rates: The Florida Experience. American Journal of Medical Quality
12: 62-68
[Abstract]
Naylor, C. D., Sermer, M., Chen, E., Sykora, K., Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Investiga,
(1996). Cesarean Delivery in Relation to Birth Weight and Gestational Glucose Tolerance: Pathophysiology or Practice Style?. JAMA
275: 1165-1170
[Abstract]
King, D. E., Lahiri, K.
(1994). Socioeconomic Factors and the Odds of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. JAMA
272: 524-529
[Abstract]
Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., Bengtson, J. M., Hebert, L. E., Weaver, S. L., Brennan, T. A., Landis, J. R.
(1993). Relationship Between Malpractice Claims and Cesarean Delivery. JAMA
269: 366-373
[Abstract]
Lomas, J., Enkin, M., Anderson, G. M., Hannah, W. J., Vayda, E., Singer, J.
(1991). Opinion Leaders vs Audit and Feedback to Implement Practice Guidelines: Delivery After Previous Cesarean Section. JAMA
265: 2202-2207
[Abstract]
Notzon, F. C
(1990). International Differences in the Use of Obstetric Interventions. JAMA
263: 3286-3291
[Abstract]
Lomas, J., Anderson, G., Enkin, M., Vayda, E., Roberts, R., MacKinnon, B.
(1988). The Role of Evidence in the Consensus Process: Results From a Canadian Consensus Exercise. JAMA
259: 3001-3005
[Abstract]
Shiono, P. H., Fielden, J. G., McNellis, D., Rhoads, G. G., Pearse, W. H.
(1987). Recent Trends in Cesarean Birth and Trial of Labor Rates in the United States. JAMA
257: 494-497
[Abstract]
Gleicher, N.
(1984). Cesarean Section Rates in the United States: The Short-term Failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980. JAMA
252: 3273-3276
[Abstract]
Previous
