Qualitative expressions of probability, such as "likely," have different numerical meanings to different people, which can lead to misunderstanding among physicians and between physicians and patients. In a study conducted through a nationwide interactive computer network based at Massachusetts General Hospital, we gathered information on the meaning of common expressions of probability. Three groups of medical professionals assigned percentage values to 12 expressions of the probability that a given symptom would appear in a patient with an unspecified disease. The median values assigned to these expressions by physicians, medical students, and other professionals were almost the same. Comparisons of the means for 7 of these 12 expressions with those found in an earlier study by other investigators showed that they were quantified in the same order, although they had not been assigned the same numerical values. This degree of agreement among professionals and between studies is encouraging for the future prospects of codifying the meaning of such expressions. The variation among five studies in the mean values assigned to 37 expressions in the medical literature and the variation among individual opinions show that such codification is necessary. In the meantime, the average numerical values presented here for various qualitative expressions of probability could well be used to enhance communication among medical professionals.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Weiss, D. L., Langlotz, C. P.
(2008). Structured Reporting: Patient Care Enhancement or Productivity Nightmare?. Radiology
249: 739-747
[Full Text]
Byass, P., Fottrell, E., Dao Lan Huong, , Berhane, Y., Corrah, T., Kahn, K., Muhe, L., Do Duc Van,
(2006). Refining a probabilistic model for interpreting verbal autopsy data. Scand J Public Health
34: 26-31
[Abstract]
Egger, J. R., Cutter, G. R., Carney, P. A., Taplin, S. H., Barlow, W. E., Hendrick, R. E., D'Orsi, C. J., Fosse, J. S., Abraham, L., Elmore, J. G.
(2005). Mammographers' Perception of Women's Breast Cancer Risk. Med Decis Making
25: 283-289
[Abstract]
Aziz, Z A, Wells, A U, Hansell, D M, Bain, G A, Copley, S J, Desai, S R, Ellis, S M, Gleeson, F V, Grubnic, S, Nicholson, A G, Padley, S P G, Pointon, K S, Reynolds, J H, Robertson, R J H, Rubens, M B
(2004). HRCT diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung disease: inter-observer variation. Thorax
59: 506-511
[Abstract][Full Text]
Penson, R. T., Daniels, K. J., Lynch, T. J. Jr.
(2004). Too Old to Care?. The Oncologist
9: 343-352
[Abstract][Full Text]
Byass, P., Dao Lan Huong, , Hoang Van Minh,
(2003). A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam. Scand J Public Health
31: 32-37
[Abstract]
Lobb, E A, Butow, P N, Meiser, B, Barratt, A, Gaff, C, Young, M A, Kirk, J, Gattas, M, Gleeson, M, Tucker, K
(2003). Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes. J. Med. Genet.
40: e56-56
[Full Text]
Byass, P., Dao Lan Huong, , Hoang Van Minh,
(2003). A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam. Scand J Public Health
31: 32-37
[Abstract]
Langlotz, C. P.
(2002). Automatic Structuring of Radiology Reports: Harbinger of a Second Information Revolution in Radiology. Radiology
224: 5-7
[Full Text]
Ohnishi, M., Fukui, T., Matsui, K., Hira, K., Shinozuka, M., Ezaki, H., Otaki, J., Kurokawa, W., Imura, H., Koyama, H., Shimbo, T.
(2002). Interpretation of and preference for probability expressions among Japanese patients and physicians. Fam Pract
19: 7-11
[Abstract][Full Text]
Redelmeier, D. A., Lustig, A. J.
(2001). Prognostic Indices in Clinical Practice. JAMA
285: 3024-3025
[Full Text]
Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., Byram, S., Fischhoff, B., Welch, H. G.
(2000). A New Scale for Assessing Perceptions of Chance: A Validation Study. Med Decis Making
20: 298-307
[Abstract]
Saitz, R.
(2000). Talking about Treatment. ANN INTERN MED
132: 93-93
[Full Text]
Bogardus, S. T. Jr, Holmboe, E., Jekel, J. F.
(1999). Perils, Pitfalls, and Possibilities in Talking About Medical Risk. JAMA
281: 1037-1041
[Abstract][Full Text]
Rothman, A. J., Kiviniemi, M. T.
(1999). Treating People With Information: an Analysis and Review of Approaches to Communicating Health Risk Information. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
1999: 44-51
[Abstract][Full Text]
Woloshin, K. K., Ruffin, M. T. IV, Gorenflo, D. W.
(1994). Patients' Interpretation of Qualitative Probability Statements. Arch Fam Med
3: 961-966
[Abstract]
Timmermans, D.
(1994). The Roles of Experience and Domain of Expertise in Using Numerical and Verbal Probability Terms in Medical Decisions. Med Decis Making
14: 146-156
[Abstract]
Merz, J. F., Druzdzel, M. J., Mazur, D. J.
(1991). Verbal Expressions of Probability in Informed Consent Litigation. Med Decis Making
11: 273-281
[Abstract]
Knaus, W., Wagner, D., Lynn, J
(1991). Short-term mortality predictions for critically ill hospitalized adults: science and ethics. Science
254: 389-394
[Abstract]
Vali, D., Rizzo, N. D.
(1991). Apparel as One Factor in Sex Crimes Against Young Females: Professional Opinions of U.S. Psychiatrists. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol
35: 167-181
[Abstract]
Chard, T.
(1991). Qualitative Probability versus Quantitative Probability in Clinical Diagnosis: A Study Using a Computer Simulation. Med Decis Making
11: 38-41
[Abstract]
Mooney, C., Mushlin, A. I., Phelps, C. E.
(1990). Targeting Assessments of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in suspected Multiple sclerosis. Med Decis Making
10: 77-94
[Abstract]
Dawson, N. V., Cebul, R. D.
(1990). Advances in Quantitative Techniques for Making Medical Decisions: The Last Decade. Eval Health Prof
13: 37-62
[Abstract]
Poses, R. M., Cebul, R. D., Centor, R. M.
(1988). Eualuating Physicians' Probabilistic Judgments. Med Decis Making
8: 233-240
[Abstract]
Langlotz, C. P., Shortliffe, E. H., Fagan, L. M.
(1988). A Methodology for Generating Computer-based Explanations of Decision-theoretic Advice. Med Decis Making
8: 290-303
[Abstract]
Previous
