FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 316:134-139 January 15, 1987 Number 3 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

We surveyed nine pediatric intensive care units (ICUs) to compare patient populations and to test prospectively the hypothesis that differences in mortality rates were due to differences in severity of illness. Age, clinical service, the reason for admission (emergency or scheduled), and the seriousness of the underlying chronic disease were recorded on admission. The severity of illness was assessed on the day of admission with a physiology-based measure, the Physiologic Stability Index. The resulting score was used to group patients according to mortality risk. The observed numbers of ICU survivors and nonsurvivors in each mortality-risk group from eight of the pediatric ICUs were compared with the predicted numbers of survivors and nonsurviors calculated from a mathematical function (logistic model) derived earlier from data on 822 patients at one of the institutions. Patient populations in the ICUs differed significantly with respect to age (range of medians, 15 to 36 months; P less than 0.0001), medical admissions (range, 39 to 81 percent; P less than 0.0001), emergency admissions (range, 53 to 91 percent; P less than 0.0001), and the percentage of patients with serious underlying chronic disease (range, 18 to 48 percent; P less than 0.0001). Mortality rates also differed significantly (range, 3.0 to 17.6 percent; P less than 0.0001), as did the Physiologic Stability Index scores (P less than 0.0001). The mathematical function based on the Physiologic Stability Index score and on age reliably predicted the outcomes in all ICUs. We conclude that differences in mortality rates among pediatric ICUs can be explained by differences in the severity of illness.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Marcin, J. P., Pollack, M. M. (2007). Review of the Acuity Scoring Systems for the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Their Use in Quality Improvement. J Intensive Care Med 22: 131-140 [Abstract]  
• Scalon, J. D., Freire, S. M., Cunha, T. A. (1998). Validation of Models for Predicting the Use of Health Technologies. Med Decis Making 18: 311-319 [Abstract]  
• Petridou, E., Richardson, D. K., Dessypris, N., Malamitsi-Puchner, A., Mantagos, S., Nicolopoulos, D., Papas, C., Salvanos, H., Sevastiadou, S., Sofatzis, J., Trichopoulos, D. (1998). Outcome Prediction in Greek Neonatal Intensive Care Units Using a Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP). Pediatrics 101: 1037-1044 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pharoah, P. O. D. (1998). Outcome Prediction in Greek Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Pediatrics 101: 1070-1070 [Full Text]  
• Ringer, S. A., Richardson, D. K., Sacher, R. A., Keszler, M., Churchill, W. H. (1998). Variations in Transfusion Practice in Neonatal Intensive Care. Pediatrics 101: 194-200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Horbar, J. D. (1992). Birthweight-adjusted Mortality Rates for Assessing the Effectiueness of Neonatal Intensive Care. Med Decis Making 12: 259-264 [Abstract]  
• Knaus, W., Wagner, D., Lynn, J (1991). Short-term mortality predictions for critically ill hospitalized adults: science and ethics. Science 254: 389-394 [Abstract]  
• Seneff, M., Knaus, W. A (1990). Predicting Patient Outcome from Intensive Care: A Guide to APACHE, MPM, SAPS, PRISM, and Other Prognostic Scoring Systems. J Intensive Care Med 5: 33-52 [Abstract]  
• Pine, M. B., Morgan, D. D., Beller, R. H. (1989). Potential Effectiveness of Comparative Casemis-corrected Adverse Outcome Rates as Quality Monitors in a Simulated Hospital System. Med Decis Making 9: 104-115 [Abstract]