FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 319:1385-1391 November 24, 1988 Number 21 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

Black infants are born with low birth weights (less than 2500 g) and very low birth weights (less than 1500 g) at twice the rate of white infants. We investigated the effect of prenatal care delivered in a health maintenance organization on the birth weights of black and white infants at normal risk for low birth weight. Using birth certificates for all children born in 1978 in the California Kaiser-Permanente hospitals, we studied data on more than 31,000 black and white newborns whose mothers' ages and levels of education were comparable. The data show that black mothers used prenatal care less extensively and had a higher incidence of infants with low birth weights (8.4 vs. 3.6 percent) and very low birth weights (2.0 vs. 0.7 percent) than white mothers. The difference in the use of prenatal care, however, accounted for less than 15 percent of the difference in the incidence of low birth weight. The rates of low birth weight, very low birth weight, and preterm birth (less than 260 days' gestation) decreased with increasing levels of prenatal care for both blacks and whites. However, increasing levels of care were associated with a greater reduction among black infants than among white infants in low birth weight, very low birth weight, and low birth weight at term (greater than or equal to 260 days' gestation). When we compared mothers who received adequate care with those who received inadequate care, the relative risk of giving birth to a very-low-birth-weight infant was reduced 3.6-fold (95 percent confidence interval, 2.0 to 6.6) for black mothers and 2.1-fold (confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.4) for white mothers; the relative risk of giving birth to a low-birth-weight infant at term was reduced 3.4-fold (95 percent confidence interval, 2.2 to 5.4) for black mothers and 1.6-fold (confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3) for white mothers. We conclude that even in a population of women at low risk for giving birth to low-birth-weight infants, prenatal care is more beneficial for blacks than for whites.

Source Information

Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Colen, C. G., Geronimus, A. T., Bound, J., James, S. A. (2006). Maternal Upward Socioeconomic Mobility and Black-White Disparities in Infant Birthweight. Am. J. Public Health 96: 2032-2039 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Partridge, C. A., Holman, J. R. (2005). Effects of a Reduced-Visit Prenatal Care Clinical Practice Guideline. J Am Board Fam Med 18: 555-560 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gould, J. B., Madan, A., Qin, C., Chavez, G. (2003). Perinatal Outcomes in Two Dissimilar Immigrant Populations in the United States: A Dual Epidemiologic Paradox. Pediatrics 111: e676-682 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Collins, J. W. Jr., Wu, S.-Y., David, R. J. (2002). Differing Intergenerational Birth Weights among the Descendants of US-born and Foreign-born Whites and African Americans in Illinois. Am J Epidemiol 155: 210-216 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yu, S. M., Alexander, G. R., Schwalberg, R., Kogan, M. D. (2001). Prenatal Care Use Among Selected Asian American Groups. Am. J. Public Health 91: 1865-1868 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schneider, E. C., Cleary, P. D., Zaslavsky, A. M., Epstein, A. M. (2001). Racial Disparity in Influenza Vaccination: Does Managed Care Narrow the Gap Between African Americans and Whites?. JAMA 286: 1455-1460 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Saftlas, A. F., Koonin, L. M., Atrash, H. K. (2000). Racial Disparity in Pregnancy-related Mortality Associated with Livebirth: Can Established Risk Factors Explain It?. Am J Epidemiol 152: 413-419 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kogan, M. D., Alexander, G. R., Kotelchuck, M., MacDorman, M. F., Buekens, P., Martin, J. A., Papiernik, E. (2000). Trends in Twin Birth Outcomes and Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1997. JAMA 284: 335-341 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• BRAVEMAN, P., MARCHI, K., EGERTER, S., PEARL, M., NEUHAUS, J. (2000). Barriers to Timely Prenatal Care Among Women With Insurance: The Importance of Prepregnancy Factors. Obstet Gynecol 95: 874-880 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kelly, R. H., Danielsen, B. H., Golding, J. M., Anders, T. F., Gilbert, W. M., Zatzick, D. F. (1999). Adequacy of Prenatal Care Among Women With Psychiatric Diagnoses Giving Birth in California in 1994 and 1995. Psychiatr. Serv. 50: 1584-1590 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kogan, M. D., Alexander, G. R., Jack, B. W., Allen, M. C. (1998). The Association Between Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization and Subsequent Pediatric Care Utilization in the United States. Pediatrics 102: 25-30 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kogan, M. D., Martin, J. A., Alexander, G. R., Kotelchuck, M., Ventura, S. J., Frigoletto, F. D. (1998). The Changing Pattern of Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, Using Different Prenatal Care Indices. JAMA 279: 1623-1628 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• David, R. J., Collins, J. W. (1997). Differing Birth Weight among Infants of U.S.-Born Blacks, African-Born Blacks, and U.S.-Born Whites. NEJM 337: 1209-1214 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Frick, K. D., Lantz, P. M. (1996). Selection Bias in Prenatal Care Utilization: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Review of the Literature. Med Care Res Rev 53: 371-396 [Abstract]