Chorionic villus sampling is a method of prenatal diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy in which tissue for genetic study is aspirated from the developing placenta by means of a catheter inserted transcervically under the guidance of ultrasonography. In this seven-center study, we compared the safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling in 2278 women with those of amniocentesis at 16 weeks' gestation in 671 women. Both groups were made up primarily of well-educated private patients; they were recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy and had viable pregnancies verified by ultrasound examination. Cytogenetic diagnoses resulted from 97.8 percent of the chorionic villus sampling procedures and 99.4 percent of the amniocenteses (P less than 0.05); aneuploidy was found in 1.8 and 1.4 percent, respectively, of the cases in which diagnoses were made. Of the women who underwent chorionic villus sampling, 17 (0.8 percent) subsequently had an amniocentesis because the diagnosis was ambiguous. Two of the diagnoses of aneuploidy (one tetraploidy, one trisomy 22) were later proved to be incorrect. On the basis of pediatric examination of the infants subsequently born to the women in the sample, there were no errors in the determination of sex or the identification of the major trisomies (21, 18, and 13). The rate of combined losses due to spontaneous and missed abortions, termination of abnormal pregnancies, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths was 7.2 percent in the group that underwent chorionic villus sampling and 5.7 percent in the group that had amniocentesis. After adjustment for slight differences in gestational and maternal age, the total loss rate for the women in the chorionic villus sampling group exceeded that for the amniocentesis group by only 0.8 percentage points (80 percent confidence interval, -0.6 to 2.2). The rate of loss of chromosomally normal fetuses after chorionic villus sampling was 10.8 percent among women in whom three or four attempts were made to place the transcervical catheter, as compared with 2.9 percent in those in whom only one attempt was necessary (P less than 0.01). There were no serious maternal infections among the women in this study or among an additional 1990 women who underwent chorionic villus sampling (upper 95 percent confidence limit, 0.08 percent). We conclude that chorionic villus sampling is a safe and effective technique for the early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities, but that it probably entails a slightly higher risk of procedure failure and of fetal loss than does amniocentesis.
Source Information
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Md. 20892.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Skotko, B. G
(2009). With new prenatal testing, will babies with Down syndrome slowly disappear?. Arch. Dis. Child.
94: 823-826
[Full Text]
Simpson, J. L.
(2008). What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Randomized clinical trial in assessing PGS: necessary but not sufficient. Hum Reprod
23: 2179-2181
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schmidt, D., Mol, A., Breymann, C., Achermann, J., Odermatt, B., Gossi, M., Neuenschwander, S., Pretre, R., Genoni, M., Zund, G., Hoerstrup, S. P.
(2006). Living Autologous Heart Valves Engineered From Human Prenatally Harvested Progenitors. Circulation
114: I-125-I-131
[Abstract][Full Text]
Amir, R. E., Sutton, V. R., Van den Veyver, I. B.
(2005). Newborn Screening and Prenatal Diagnosis for Rett Syndrome: Implications for Therapy. J Child Neurol
20: 779-783
[Abstract]
Amir, R. E., Reid Sutton, V., Van den Veyver, I. B.
(2005). Newborn Screening and Prenatal Diagnosis for Rett Syndrome: Implications for Therapy. J Child Neurol
20: 779-783
[Abstract]
Mennuti, M. T., Driscoll, D. A.
(2003). Screening for Down's Syndrome -- Too Many Choices?. NEJM
349: 1471-1473
[Full Text]
Prosser, B. J., Horton, J.
(2003). A Rare Case of Serratia Sepsis and Spontaneous Abortion. NEJM
348: 668-669
[Full Text]
(2000). Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. JWatch Women's Health
2000: 19-19
[Full Text]
Jenkins, T. M., Wapner, R. J., Reynolds, T., Zimmermann, R., Wright, E., Malone, F. D., D'Alton, M. E., Berkowitz, R. L., Wald, N., Watt, H., Hackshaw, A., Copel, J. A., Bahado-Singh, R. O.
(1999). Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome. NEJM
341: 1935-1937
[Full Text]
Flake, A. W., Zanjani, E. D.
(1999). In Utero Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Ontogenic Opportunities and Biologic Barriers. Blood
94: 2179-2191
[Full Text]
Copel, J. A., Bahado-Singh, R. O.
(1999). Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome -- A Search for the Family's Values. NEJM
341: 521-522
[Full Text]
Heckerling, P. S., Verp, M. S., Albert, N.
(1999). Patient or Physician Preferences for Decision Analysis: The Prenatal Genetic Testing Decision. Med Decis Making
19: 66-77
[Abstract]
Epner, J. E. G., Jonas, H. S., Seckinger, D. L.
(1998). Late-term Abortion. JAMA
280: 724-729
[Abstract][Full Text]
Flake, A. W., Zanjani, E. D.
(1997). In Utero Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Status Report. JAMA
278: 932-937
[Abstract]
Kuppermann, M., Shiboski, S., Feeny, D., Elkin, E. P., Washington, A. E.
(1997). Can Preference Scores for Discrete States Be Used to Derive Preference Scores for an Entire Path of Events?: An Application to Prenatal Diagnosis. Med Decis Making
17: 42-55
[Abstract]
D'Alton, M. E., DeCherney, A. H.
(1993). Prenatal Diagnosis. NEJM
328: 114-120
[Full Text]
SHULMAN, L. P., MURAM, D., SPECK, P. M.
(1992). Counseling Sexual Assault Victims Who Become Pregnant After the Assault: Benefits and Limitations of First-Trimester Paternity Determination. J Interpers Violence
7: 205-210
[Abstract]
Tunis, S. L., Golbus, M. S., Copeland, K. L., Fine, B. A., Rosinsky, B. J., Seely, L.
(1990). Normative Scores and Factor Structure of the Profile of Mood States for Women Seeking Prenatal Diagnosis for Advanced Maternal Age. Educational and Psychological Measurement
50: 309-324
[Abstract]
Caskey, C. T., McKusick, V. A.
(1990). Medical Genetics. JAMA
263: 2654-2656
[Abstract]
(1990). Questions and Answers. JAMA
263: 305-306
Hansen, J., Sladek, J. Jr
(1989). Fetal research. Science
246: 775-779
[Abstract]
(1989). FIRST TRIMESTER CVS IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. JWatch General
1989: 1-1
[Full Text]
