FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 320:358-365 February 9, 1989 Number 6 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness, safety, and costs of outpatient (n = 87) and inpatient (n = 77) detoxification from alcohol in a randomized, prospective trial involving 164 male veterans of low socioeconomic status. The outpatients were evaluated medically and psychiatrically and then were prescribed decreasing doses of oxazepam on the basis of daily clinic visits. The inpatient program combined comprehensive psychiatric and medical evaluation, detoxification with oxazepam, and the initiation of rehabilitation treatment. The mean duration of treatment was significantly shorter for outpatients (6.5 days) than for inpatients (9.2 days). On the other hand, significantly more inpatients (95 percent) than outpatient (72 percent) completed detoxification. There were no serious medical complications in either group. Outcome evaluations completed at one and six months for 93 and 85 percent of the patients, respectively, showed substantial improvement in both groups at both follow-up periods. At one month there were fewer alcohol-related problems among inpatients and fewer medical problems among outpatients. However, no group differences were found at the six-month follow-up, nor were differences found in the subsequent use of other alcoholism-treatment services. Costs were substantially greater for inpatients ($3,319 to $3,665 per patient) than for outpatients ($175 to $388). We conclude that outpatient medical detoxification is an effective, safe, and low-cost treatment for patients with mid-to-moderate symptoms of alcohol withdrawal.

Source Information

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lineberry, T. W. (2008). Poor Care, Not Poor Protocols, for Alcohol Withdrawal-4. Mayo Clin Proc. 83: 727-728 [Full Text]  
• MUELLER, S. E., PETITJEAN, S., BOENING, J., WIESBECK, G. A. (2007). THE IMPACT OF SELF-HELP GROUP ATTENDANCE ON RELAPSE RATES AFTER ALCOHOL DETOXIFICATION IN A CONTROLLED STUDY. Alcohol Alcohol 42: 108-112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Luty, J. (2006). What works in alcohol use disorders?. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 12: 13-22 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• French, M. T., Salome, H. J., Krupski, A., Mckay, J. R., Donovan, D. M., Mclellan, A. T., Durell, J. (2000). Benefit-Cost Analysis of Residential and Outpatient Addiction Treatment in the State of Washington. Eval Rev 24: 609-634 [Abstract]  
• Fiellin, D. A., Reid, M. C., O'Connor, P. G. (2000). Outpatient Management of Patients with Alcohol Problems. ANN INTERN MED 133: 815-827 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• O'Connor, P. G., Schottenfeld, R. S. (1998). Patients with Alcohol Problems. NEJM 338: 592-602 [Full Text]  
• Kraemer, K. L., Mayo-Smith, M. F., Calkins, D. R. (1997). Impact of Age on the Severity, Course, and Complications of Alcohol Withdrawal. Arch Intern Med 157: 2234-2241 [Abstract]  
• Fuller, R. K., Gordis, E. (1994). Refining the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal. JAMA 272: 557-558 [Abstract]  
• Michels, R., Marzuk, P. M. (1993). Progress in Psychiatry- Second of Two Parts. NEJM 329: 628-638 [Full Text]  
• Ives, T. J. (1991). Professional Development and Clinical Specialization in Chemical Dependency Pharmacy Practice. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 4: 380-385  
• Malcolm, R. (1990). Little Battles. JAMA 263: 90-90 [Abstract]