FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 325:17-23 July 4, 1991 Number 1 Next

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty was developed as an alternative to aortic-valve replacement in selected elderly patients with aortic stenosis. The use of this procedure is limited, however, by a high incidence of restenosis. METHODS. Between December 1985 and April 1989, valvuloplasty was performed in 205 patients. We evaluated 40 demographic and hemodynamic variables as univariate predictors of event-free survival by Cox regression analysis and identified independent predictors of event-free survival by stepwise multivariate analysis. RESULTS. Early hemodynamic results indicated a decrease in the peak transaortic-valve pressure gradient from 67 +/- 28 to 33 +/- 15 mm Hg after valvuloplasty and an increase in aortic-valve area from 0.6 +/- 0.2 to 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm2 (P less than 0.001 for both comparisons). The rate of event-free survival (defined as survival without recurrent symptoms, repeated valvuloplasty, or aortic-valve replacement) was 18 percent over the mean (+/- SD) follow-up period of 24 +/- 12 months (range, 1 to 47). Significant predictors of event-free survival included the left ventricular ejection fraction and the left ventricular and aortic systolic pressure before valvuloplasty, and the percent reduction in the aortic-valve pressure gradient; the pulmonary-capillary wedge pressure was inversely associated with event-free survival. Although the predicted event-free survival rate for the entire patient group was 50 percent at one year (95 percent confidence interval, 43 to 57 percent) and 25 percent at two years (95 percent confidence interval, 19 to 31 percent), the probability of event-free survival at one year varied between 23 and 65 percent when patients were stratified according to three independent predictors: the aortic systolic pressure, the pulmonary-capillary wedge pressure, and the percent reduction in the peak aortic-valve gradient. CONCLUSIONS. The most important predictors of event-free survival after balloon aortic valvuloplasty were related to base-line left ventricular performance. The best long-term results after valvuloplasty were observed among patients who would also have been expected to have excellent long-term results after aortic-valve replacement.

Source Information

Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Boston.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Chiam, P. T.L., Ruiz, C. E. (2008). Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing Results, Judging Outcomes, and Planning Trials: The Interventionalist Perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1: 341-350 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Desai, N. D., Christakis, G. T. (2008). Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves. Card Surg Adult 3: 857-894 [Full Text]  
• King, S. B. III, Aversano, T., Ballard, W. L., Beekman, R. H. III, Cowley, M. J., Ellis, S. G., Faxon, D. P., Hannan, E. L., Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Jacobs, A. K., Kellett, M. A. Jr, Kimmel, S. E., Landzberg, J. S., McKeever, L. S., Moscucci, M., Pomerantz, R. M., Smith, K. M., Vetrovec, G. W., Creager, M. A., Hirshfeld, J. W. Jr, Holmes, D. R. Jr, Newby, L. K., Weitz, H. H., Merli, G., Pina, I., Rodgers, G. P., Tracy, C. M. (2007). ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2007 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Update the 1998 Clinical Competence Statement on Recommendations for the Assessment and Maintenance of Proficiency in Coronary Interventional Procedures). J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 82-108 [Full Text]  
• Hara, H., Pedersen, W. R., Ladich, E., Mooney, M., Virmani, R., Nakamura, M., Feldman, T., Schwartz, R. S. (2007). Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Revisited: Time for a Renaissance?. Circulation 115: e334-e338 [Full Text]  
• Auerbach, A., Goldman, L. (2006). Assessing and Reducing the Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery. Circulation 113: 1361-1376 [Full Text]  
• Webb, J. G., Chandavimol, M., Thompson, C. R., Ricci, D. R., Carere, R. G., Munt, B. I., Buller, C. E., Pasupati, S., Lichtenstein, S. (2006). Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Retrograde From the Femoral Artery. Circulation 113: 842-850 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Desai, N. D., Christakis, G. T. (2003). Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement. Card Surg Adult 2: 825-856 [Full Text]  
• SPRIGINGS, D C (1999). Cardiac surgery in the elderly: a cardiologist's perspective. Heart 82: 123-124 [Full Text]  
• Chambers, C. E., Riebel, S. T, Kozak, M. (1999). Interventional Cardiology: Advances in Percutaneous Techniques for the Treatment of Cardiac Disease. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 3: 109-125 [Abstract]  
• Medalion, B., Lytle, B. W., McCarthy, P. M., Stewart, R. W., Arheart, K. L., Arnold, J. H., Loop, F. D., Cosgrove, D. M. III (1998). Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad?. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 66: 699-706 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wong, J. B., Salem, D. N., Pauker, S. G. (1993). You're Never Too Old. NEJM 328: 971-975 [Full Text]  
• (1991). PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME AFTER BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY. JWatch General 1991: 4-4 [Full Text]