BACKGROUND. Employee-assistance programs sponsored by companies or labor unions identify workers who abuse alcohol and refer them for care, often to inpatient rehabilitation programs. Yet the effectiveness of inpatient treatment, as compared with a variety of less intensive alternatives, has repeatedly been called into question. In this study, anchored in the work site, we compared the effectiveness of mandatory in-hospital treatment with that of required attendance at the meetings of a self-help group and a choice of treatment options. METHODS. We randomly assigned a series of 227 workers newly identified as abusing alcohol to one of three rehabilitation regimens: compulsory inpatient treatment, compulsory attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings, and a choice of options. Inpatient backup was provided if needed. The groups were compared in terms of 12 job-performance variables and 12 measures of drinking and drug use during a two-year follow-up period. RESULTS. All three groups improved, and no significant differences were found among the groups in job-related outcome variables. On seven measures of drinking and drug use, however, we found significant differences at several follow-up assessments. The hospital group fared best and that assigned to AA the least well; those allowed to choose a program had intermediate outcomes. Additional inpatient treatment was required significantly more often (P less than 0.0001) by the AA group (63 percent) and the choice group (38 percent) than by subjects assigned to initial treatment in the hospital (23 percent). The differences among the groups were especially pronounced for workers who had used cocaine within six months before study entry. The estimated costs of inpatient treatment for the AA and choice groups averaged only 10 percent less than the costs for the hospital group because of their higher rates of additional treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Even for employed problem drinkers who are not abusing drugs and who have no serious medical problems, an initial referral to AA alone or a choice of programs, although less costly than inpatient care, involves more risk than compulsory inpatient treatment and should be accompanied by close monitoring for signs of incipient relapse.
Source Information
Department of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Laudet, A., Stanick, V., Sands, B.
(2007). An Exploration of the Effect of On-Site 12-Step Meetings on Post-Treatment Outcomes among Polysubstance-Dependent Outpatient Clients. Eval Rev
31: 613-646
[Abstract]
Humphreys, K., Moos, R. H.
(2007). Encouraging Posttreatment Self-Help Group Involvement to Reduce Demand for Continuing Care Services: Two-Year Clinical and Utilization Outcomes. Focus
5: 193-198
[Abstract][Full Text]
Slaski, S., Zylicz, P. O.
(2006). The effect of psychotherapy on self-awareness in incarcerated and nonincarcerated alcoholics: a pilot study.. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol
50: 559-569
[Abstract]
Lingford-Hughes, A. R., Welch, S., Nutt, D. J.
(2004). Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Pharmacological Management of Substance Misuse, Addiction and Comorbidity: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol
18: 293-335
SAVOLA, O., NIEMELA, O., HILLBOM, M.
(2004). BLOOD ALCOHOL IS THE BEST INDICATOR OF HAZARDOUS ALCOHOL DRINKING IN YOUNG ADULTS AND WORKING-AGE PATIENTS WITH TRAUMA. Alcohol Alcohol
39: 340-345
[Abstract][Full Text]
Mohr, W. K.
(2004). Surfacing the Life Phases of a Mental Health Support Group. Qual Health Res
14: 61-77
[Abstract]
Gonzalez, G., Rosenheck, R. A.
(2002). Outcomes and Service Use Among Homeless Persons With Serious Mental Illness and Substance Abuse. Psychiatr. Serv.
53: 437-446
[Abstract][Full Text]
Dinh-Zarr, T., Diguiseppi, C., Heitman, E., Roberts, I.
(1999). PREVENTING INJURIES THROUGH INTERVENTIONS FOR PROBLEM DRINKING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS. Alcohol Alcohol
34: 609-621
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., Bradley, K. A., for the Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Projec,
(1998). The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking. Arch Intern Med
158: 1789-1795
[Abstract][Full Text]
Schinka, J. A., Francis, E., Hughes, P., LaLone, L., Flynn, C.
(1998). Comparative Outcomes and Costs of Inpatient Care and Supportive Housing for Substance-Dependent Veterans. Psychiatr. Serv.
49: 946-950
[Abstract][Full Text]
O'Connor, P. G., Schottenfeld, R. S.
(1998). Patients with Alcohol Problems. NEJM
338: 592-602
[Full Text]
Goodman, A. C., Nishiura, E., Hankin, J. R., Holder, H. D., Tilford, J. M.
(1996). Long-Term Alcoholism Treatment Costs. Med Care Res Rev
53: 441-464
[Abstract]
McCrady, B. S., Langenbucher, J. W.
(1996). Alcohol Treatment and Health Care System Reform. Arch Gen Psychiatry
53: 737-746
[Abstract]
Delbanco, T. L.
(1996). Patients Who Drink Alcohol: Pain, Pleasure, and Paradox. JAMA
275: 803-804
[Abstract]
O'Connor, P. G., Selwyn, P. A., Schottenfeld, R. S.
(1994). Medical Care for Injection-Drug Users with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. NEJM
331: 450-459
[Full Text]
Frances, R., Franklin, J. E.
(1992). Addiction Medicine. JAMA
268: 330-332
[Abstract]
Walsh, D. C., Hingson, R. W., Merrigan, D. M., Levenson, S. M., Coffman, G. A., Heeren, T., Cupples, L. A.
(1992). The Impact of a Physician's Warning on Recovery After Alcoholism Treatment. JAMA
267: 663-667
[Abstract]
Previous
