FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 325:1180-1183 October 17, 1991 Number 16

	Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Efficient, undistorted communication of the results of medical research is important to physicians, the scientific community, and the public. Information that first appears in the scientific literature is frequently retransmitted in the popular press. Does popular coverage of medical research in turn amplify the effects of that research on the scientific community? METHODS. To test the hypothesis that researchers are more likely to cite papers that have been publicized in the popular press, we compared the number of references in the Science Citation Index to articles in the New England Journal of Medicine that were covered by The New York Times with the number of references to similar articles that were not covered by the Times. We also performed the comparison during a three-month period when the Times was on strike but continued to prepare an "edition of record" that was not distributed; doing so enabled us to address the possibility that coverage in the Times was simply a marker of the most important articles, which would therefore be cited more frequently, even without coverage in the popular press. RESULTS. Articles in the Journal that were covered by the Times received a disproportionate number of scientific citations in each of the 10 years after the Journal articles appeared. The effect was strongest in the first year after publication, when Journal articles publicized by the Times received 72.8 percent more scientific citations than control articles. This effect was not present for articles published during the strike; articles covered by the Times during this period were no more likely to be cited than those not covered. CONCLUSIONS. Coverage of medical research in the popular press amplifies the transmission of medical information from the scientific literature to the research community.

Source Information

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Godlee, F. (2008). Open access to research. BMJ 337: a1051-a1051 [Full Text]  
• Wiener, R. S., Welch, H. G. (2007). Trends in the Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in the United States, 1993-2004. JAMA 298: 423-429 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V, Van Der Weyden, M. B (2007). Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. JRSM 100: 142-150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chapman, S., Nguyen, T. N., White, C. (2007). Press-released papers are more downloaded and cited. Tobacco Control 16: 71-71 [Full Text]  
• Bastian, H. (2006). 'They would say that, wouldn't they?' A reader's guide to author and sponsor biases in clinical research. JRSM 99: 611-614 [Full Text]  
• Smith, R. (2006). Medical journals and the mass media: moving from love and hate to love. JRSM 99: 347-352 [Full Text]  
• Clark, F., Illman, D. L. (2006). A Longitudinal Study of the New York Times Science Times Section. Science Communication 27: 496-513 [Abstract]  
• Cassidy, A. (2006). Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work. Public Understanding of Science 15: 175-205 [Abstract]  
• Stryker, J. E., Solky, B. A., Emmons, K. M. (2005). A Content Analysis of News Coverage of Skin Cancer Prevention and Detection, 1979 to 2003. Arch Dermatol 141: 491-496 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S. (2004). The Media Matter: A Call for Straightforward Medical Reporting. ANN INTERN MED 140: 226-228 [Full Text]  
• Kiernan, V. (2003). Diffusion of News about Research. Science Communication 25: 3-13 [Abstract]  
• Rier, D. A. (2003). Work Setting, Publication, and Scientific Responsibility. Science Communication 24: 420-457 [Abstract]  
• Mountcastle-Shah, E., Tambor, E., Bernhardt, B. A., Geller, G., Karaliukas, R., Rodgers, J. E., Holtzman, N. A. (2003). Assessing Mass Media Reporting of Disease-Related Genetic Discoveries: Development of an Instrument and Initial Findings. Science Communication 24: 458-478 [Abstract]  
• Cassels, A., Hughes, M. A., Cole, C., Mintzes, B., Lexchin, J., McCormack, J. P. (2003). Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs. CMAJ 168: 1133-1137 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rier, D. A. (2003). Gender, Lifecourse and Publication Decisions in Toxic-Exposure Epidemiology:: `Now!' Versus `Wait a Minute!'. Social Studies of Science 33: 269-300 [Abstract]  
• Pentz, R. D., Flamm, A. L., Sugarman, J., Cohen, M. Z., Daniel Ayers, G., Herbst, R. S., Abbruzzese, J. L. (2002). Study of the Media's Potential Influence on Prospective Research Participants' Understanding of and Motivations for Participation in a High-Profile Phase I Trial. JCO 20: 3785-3791 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M. (2002). Press Releases: Translating Research Into News. JAMA 287: 2856-2858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Baczek, L. (2002). Media Coverage of Scientific Meetings: Too Much, Too Soon?. JAMA 287: 2859-2863 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Geller, G., Bernhardt, B. A., Holtzman, N. A. (2002). The Media and Public Reaction to Genetic Research. JAMA 287: 773-773 [Full Text]  
• Ray, J. G. (2002). Evidence in Upheaval: Incorporating Observational Data Into Clinical Practice. Arch Intern Med 162: 249-254 [Full Text]  
• Wells, J., Marshall, P., Crawley, B., Dickersin, K. (2001). Newspaper Reporting of Screening Mammography. ANN INTERN MED 135: 1029-1037 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gastel, B. (2001). Assessing the impact of investigators' work: beyond impact factors/Evaluer l'influence des travaux de recherche au dela des facteurs d'impact. Canadian J. Anesthesia 48: 941-945 [Full Text]  
• Steinbrook, R. (2000). Medical Journals and Medical Reporting. NEJM 342: 1668-1671 [Full Text]  
• Krauss, G. L., Gondek, S., Krumholz, A., Paul, S., Shen, F. (2000). ""The Scarlet E"": The presentation of epilepsy in the English language print media. Neurology 54: 1894-1898 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• PERRY, C. A., RICE, R. E. (1999). Network Influences on Involvement in the Hybrid Problem Area of Developmental Dyslexia. Science Communication 21: 38-74 [Abstract]  
• Kennedy, G. E, Bero, L. A (1999). Print media coverage of research on passive smoking. Tobacco Control 8: 254-260 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• KIERNAN, V. (1998). Changing Embargoes and the New York Times' Coverage of the Journal of the American Medical Association. Science Communication 19: 212-221 [Abstract]  
• Cialdini, R. B. (1997). Professionally Responsible Communication with the Public: Giving Psychology a Way. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23: 675-683 [Abstract]  
• KIERNAN, V. (1997). Ingelfinger, Embargoes, and Other Controls on the Dissemination of Science News. Science Communication 18: 297-319 [Abstract]  
• DIRK, L. (1996). From Laboratory to Scientific Literature: The Life and Death of Biomedical Research Results. Science Communication 18: 3-28 [Abstract]  
• Entwistle, V. (1995). Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. BMJ 310: 920-923 [Full Text]