The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 327:1329-1335 November 5, 1992 Number 19
NextNext

Predictors of long-term outcome after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty
DJ Cohen, RE Kuntz, SP Gordon, RN Piana, RD Safian, RG McKay, DS Baim, W Grossman, and DJ Diver

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty is known to produce short-term hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in many patients with mitral stenosis. Comprehensive assessment of the clinical usefulness of balloon valvuloplasty requires evaluation of patients' long-term outcomes. METHODS. We performed balloon mitral valvuloplasty in 146 patients between October 1, 1985, and October 1, 1991. Base-line demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic variables were evaluated in order to identify predictors of long-term event-free survival. RESULTS. Balloon mitral valvuloplasty was completed successfully in 136 (93 percent) of the patients in whom the procedure was attempted; it resulted in an increase in the mean (+/- SD) mitral-valve area from 1.0 +/- 0.4 to 2.1 +/- 0.9 cm2 and a decrease in the mean transmitral pressure gradient from 14 +/- 5 to 6 +/- 3 mm Hg (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). The estimated overall five-year survival rate was 76 +/- 5 percent, and the estimated five-year event-free survival rate (the percentage of patients without mitral-valve replacement, repeat valvuloplasty, or death from cardiac causes) was 51 +/- 6 percent. According to multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis, the independent predictors of longer event-free survival were a lower mitral-valve echocardiographic score (a measure of mitral-valve deformity; range, 0 for a normal valve to 16 for a seriously deformed valve; P < 0.001), lower left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (P = 0.001), and a lower New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (P = 0.04). Patients with no risk factors for early restenosis or only one risk factor (echocardiographic score > 8, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure > 10 mm Hg, or NYHA functional class IV) had a predicted five-year event-free survival rate of 60 to 84 percent, whereas patients with two or three risk factors had a predicted five-year event-free survival rate of only 13 to 41 percent. CONCLUSIONS. Balloon mitral valvuloplasty as a treatment for selected patients with mitral stenosis has good long-term results. The long-term outcome after this procedure can be predicted on the basis of patients' base-line characteristics.


Source Information

Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.