The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1995;332(21):1455.

Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:1036-1040 April 14, 1994 Number 15
NextNext

Preserved Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation in Patients with Essential Hypertension
John R. Cockcroft, Philip J. Chowienczyk, Nigel Benjamin, and James M. Ritter

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Previous studies suggest that vascular endothelial function may be impaired in essential hypertension. Although muscarinic agonists dilate blood vessels by releasing an endothelium-derived relaxing factor closely related to nitric oxide, nitroprusside dilates vessels by a mechanism that is independent of the endothelium. The finding of an impaired response to muscarinic agonists but a normal response to nitroprusside in patients with hypertension has suggested that endothelial function is abnormal in hypertension.

Methods We reassessed this issue by measuring forearm blood flow by plethysmography during the infusion of vasodilators into the brachial arteries of 95 subjects: 37 normotensive controls (mean [±SE] arterial blood pressure, 92 ±1 mm Hg) and 58 patients with essential hypertension (mean arterial blood pressure, 121 ±1 mm Hg).

Results In an initial study, vascular responses to the vasodilators carbachol and nitroprusside were similar in normotensive controls (n = 19) and hypertensive patients (n = 17). We wondered whether this might be attributable to the use of previously untreated patients or to the choice of carbachol as the muscarinic agonist. However, we found that the vasodilator responses to nitroprusside, acetylcholine, carbachol, and isoproterenol were also similar in separate groups of normotensive controls (n = 18) and hypertensive subjects, whether the subjects had never been treated for hypertension (n = 24) or had had therapy withheld for two weeks (n = 17). The 95 percent confidence intervals for the difference between the controls and hypertensive patients in the ratio of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation induced by acetylcholine or carbachol to endothelium-independent vasodilatation induced by nitroprusside were -14 to +23 percent for acetylcholine and -13 to +12 percent for carbachol.

Conclusions In contrast to previous studies, our findings suggest that selective impairment of the responsiveness of the forearm vasculature to muscarinic agonists is not universal in patients with essential hypertension. .


Source Information

From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, United Medical and Dental School of Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospitals, University of London, London.

Address reprint requests to Professor Ritter at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, UMDS, Medical School Building, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation and Essential Hypertension
Panza J. A., Cockcroft J. R., Chowienczyk P. J., Ritter J. M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:951, Oct 6, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.