FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Volume 330:1101-1106 April 21, 1994 Number 16 Next

	Full Text Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background It has been suggested that women with clinical evidence of coronary artery disease are less often referred for cardiac catheterization than are men. To determine whether there is sex-related bias in referral for cardiac catheterization, we prospectively studied a cohort of 410 symptomatic outpatients (280 men and 130 women) who were being evaluated with exercise testing for possible coronary artery disease.

Methods Before the patients underwent exercise testing, 15 cardiologists from an academic medical center were asked to predict the probability that the patients they saw in the cardiology clinic would have angiographic evidence of any obstructive coronary disease (stenosis of 75 percent or more); the probability of severe coronary disease (three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease); the probability of left main coronary artery disease; and the probability of survival one, three, and five years after the evaluation. Similar predictions were generated by previously validated statistical models with use of data collected before exercise testing from the history, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiography with the patient at rest.

Results Overall, women were referred for cardiac catheterization significantly less often than men (18 percent vs. 27 percent, P = 0.03). As compared with men, women had a significantly lower pretest probability of coronary disease (as estimated by their physicians) and a lower rate of positive exercise-test results. After accounting for differences in these two factors, sex was not an independent predictor of referral for catheterization. Comparing physicians' estimates of outcome with those generated by the statistical models revealed no evidence that the physicians were underestimating the risk of coronary disease in women. Furthermore, physicians' predictions did not underestimate the probability of any obstructive coronary disease in men and women who subsequently underwent catheterization.

Conclusions Academic cardiologists made appropriately lower pretest predictions of categories of disease in women with possible coronary artery disease than in men, and these assessments, along with women's lower rate of positive exercise tests, rather than bias based on sex, accounted for the lower rate of catheterization among women. .

Source Information

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (D.B.M., L.K.S., R.M.C., D.B.P.), and the Division of Biometry, Department of Community and Family Medicine (E.R.D.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Mark at Duke University Medical Center, Box 3485, Durham, NC 27710.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Reversible Lymphoma in the Setting of Azathioprine Therapy for Crohn's Disease
Larvol L., Soule J.-C., Le Tourneau A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:883-884, Sep 29, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Verheugt, C. L., Uiterwaal, C. S.P.M., van der Velde, E. T., Meijboom, F. J., Pieper, P. G., Vliegen, H. W., van Dijk, A. P.J., Bouma, B. J., Grobbee, D. E., Mulder, B. J.M. (2008). Gender and Outcome in Adult Congenital Heart Disease. Circulation 118: 26-32 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Han, S. H., Bae, J. H., Holmes, D. R. Jr, Lennon, R. J., Eeckhout, E., Barsness, G. W., Rihal, C. S., Lerman, A. (2008). Sex differences in atheroma burden and endothelial function in patients with early coronary atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 29: 1359-1369 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pilote, L., Dasgupta, K., Guru, V., Humphries, K. H., McGrath, J., Norris, C., Rabi, D., Tremblay, J., Alamian, A., Barnett, T., Cox, J., Ghali, W. A., Grace, S., Hamet, P., Ho, T., Kirkland, S., Lambert, M., Libersan, D., O'Loughlin, J., Paradis, G., Petrovich, M., Tagalakis, V. (2007). A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease. CMAJ 176: S1-S44 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lewis, R., Lamdan, R. M., Wald, D., Curtis, M. (2006). Gender Bias in the Diagnosis of a Geriatric Standardized Patient: A Potential Confounding Variable. Acad. Psychiatry 30: 392-396 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shaw, L. J., Bairey Merz, C. N., Pepine, C. J., Reis, S. E., Bittner, V., Kelsey, S. F., Olson, M., Johnson, B. D., Mankad, S., Sharaf, B. L., Rogers, W. J., Wessel, T. R., Arant, C. B., Pohost, G. M., Lerman, A., Quyyumi, A. A., Sopko, G., for the WISE Investigators, (2006). Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: Gender Differences in Traditional and Novel Risk Factors, Symptom Evaluation, and Gender-Optimized Diagnostic Strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: S4-S20 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bairey Merz, C. N., Shaw, L. J., Reis, S. E., Bittner, V., Kelsey, S. F., Olson, M., Johnson, B. D., Pepine, C. J., Mankad, S., Sharaf, B. L., Rogers, W. J., Pohost, G. M., Lerman, A., Quyyumi, A. A., Sopko, G., for the WISE Investigators, (2006). Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: Gender Differences in Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcome With Regard to Gender-Based Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis and Macrovascular and Microvascular Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: S21-S29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vaccarino, V. (2006). Angina and Cardiac Care: Are There Gender Differences, and If So, Why?. Circulation 113: 467-469 [Full Text]  
• Daly, C., Clemens, F., Lopez Sendon, J. L., Tavazzi, L., Boersma, E., Danchin, N., Delahaye, F., Gitt, A., Julian, D., Mulcahy, D., Ruzyllo, W., Thygesen, K., Verheugt, F., Fox, K. M., on behalf of the Euro Heart Survey Investigators, (2006). Gender Differences in the Management and Clinical Outcome of Stable Angina. Circulation 113: 490-498 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mieres, J. H., Shaw, L. J., Arai, A., Budoff, M. J., Flamm, S. D., Hundley, W. G., Marwick, T. H., Mosca, L., Patel, A. R., Quinones, M. A., Redberg, R. F., Taubert, K. A., Taylor, A. J., Thomas, G. S., Wenger, N. K. (2005). Role of Noninvasive Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus Statement From the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation 111: 682-696 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stein, P. D., Hull, R. D., Patel, K. C., Olson, R. E., Ghali, W. A., Alshab, A. K., Meyers, F. A. (2003). Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Comparison of the Diagnostic Process in Men and Women. Arch Intern Med 163: 1689-1694 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rathore, S. S., Wang, Y., Radford, M. J., Ordin, D. L., Krumholz, H. M. (2002). Sex Differences in Cardiac Catheterization after Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Procedure Appropriateness. ANN INTERN MED 137: 487-493 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Aguilar, M D, Lazaro, P, Fitch, K, Luengo, S (2002). Gender differences in clinical status at time of coronary revascularisation in Spain. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56: 555-559 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ghali, W. A., Faris, P. D., Galbraith, P. D., Norris, C. M., Curtis, M. J., Saunders, L. D., Dzavik, V., Mitchell, L. B., Knudtson, M. L., for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Ass, (2002). Sex Differences in Access to Coronary Revascularization after Cardiac Catheterization: Importance of Detailed Clinical Data. ANN INTERN MED 136: 723-732 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wenger, N. K (2002). Clinical characteristics of coronary heart disease in women: emphasis on gender differences. Cardiovasc Res 53: 558-567 [Full Text]  
• Rathore, S. S., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Radford, M. J., Vaccarino, V., Krumholz, H. M. (2001). Sex Differences in Cardiac Catheterization: The Role of Physician Gender. JAMA 286: 2849-2856 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Williams, S. V., Fihn, S. D., Gibbons, R. J. (2001). Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina: Diagnosis and Risk Stratification. ANN INTERN MED 135: 530-547 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, T. D., Roger, V. L., Hodge, D. O., Hopfenspirger, M. R., Bailey, K. R., Gibbons, R. J. (2001). Gender differences and temporal trends in clinical characteristics, stress test results and use of invasive procedures in patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 38: 690-697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wong, Y, Rodwell, A, Dawkins, S, Livesey, S A, Simpson, I A (2001). Sex differences in investigation results and treatment in subjects referred for investigation of chest pain. Heart 85: 149-152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mehilli, J., Kastrati, A., Dirschinger, J., Bollwein, H., Neumann, F.-J., Schomig, A. (2000). Differences in Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Between Women and Men Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting. JAMA 284: 1799-1805 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Remennick, L. I., Raanan, O. (2000). Institutional and Attitudinal Factors Involved in Higher Mortality of Israeli Women after Coronary Bypass Surgery: Another Case of Gender Bias. Health (London) 4: 455-478 [Abstract]  
• Roeters van Lennep, J.E, Zwinderman, A.H, Roeters van Lennep, H.W.O, Westerveld, H.E, Plokker, H.W.M, Voors, A.A, Bruschke, A.V.G, van der Wall, E.E (2000). Gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease from 1981 to 1997. No evidence for the Yentl syndrome. Eur Heart J 21: 911-918 [Abstract]  
• Kilaru, P. K., Kelly, R. F., Calvin, J. E., Parrillo, J. E. (2000). Utilization of coronary angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction in men and women risk stratified by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 35: 974-979 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roger, V. L., Farkouh, M. E., Weston, S. A., Reeder, G. S., Jacobsen, S. J., Zinsmeister, A. R., Yawn, B. P., Kopecky, S. L., Gabriel, S. E. (2000). Sex Differences in Evaluation and Outcome of Unstable Angina. JAMA 283: 646-652 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mark, D. B. (2000). Sex Bias in Cardiovascular Care: Should Women Be Treated More Like Men?. JAMA 283: 659-661 [Full Text]  
• Moreno, R., Ortega, A., Cantalapiedra, J-L., Lopez de sa, E., Delcan, J.-L. (1999). Does a sex bias really exist in the management of women with coronary heart disease?. Eur Heart J 20: 1600-1600  
• Gibbons, R. J., Chatterjee, K., Daley, J., Douglas, J. S., Fihn, S. D., Gardin, J. M., Grunwald, M. A., Levy, D., Lytle, B. W., O'Rourke, R. A., Schafer, W. P., Williams, S. V., Ritchie, J. L., Gibbons, R. J., Cheitlin, M. D., Eagle, K. A., Gardner, T. J., Garson, A. Jr, Russell, R. O., Ryan, T. J., Smith, S. C. Jr (1999). ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 33: 2092-2197 [Full Text]  
• Schulman, K. A., Berlin, J. A., Harless, W., Kerner, J. F., Sistrunk, S., Gersh, B. J., Dube, R., Taleghani, C. K., Burke, J. E., Williams, S., Eisenberg, J. M., Escarce, J. J., Ayers, W. (1999). The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization. NEJM 340: 618-626 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vaccarino, V., Horwitz, R. I., Meehan, T. P., Petrillo, M. K., Radford, M. J., Krumholz, H. M. (1998). Sex Differences in Mortality After Myocardial Infarction: Evidence for a Sex-Age Interaction. Arch Intern Med 158: 2054-2062 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roger, V. L., Jacobsen, S. J., Pellikka, P. A., Miller, T. D., Bailey, K. R., Gersh, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in use of stress testing and coronary heart disease mortality: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Am Coll Cardiol 32: 345-352 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chandra, N. C., Ziegelstein, R. C., Rogers, W. J., Tiefenbrunn, A. J., Gore, J. M., French, W. J., Rubison, M., for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, (1998). Observations of the Treatment of Women in the United States With Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Arch Intern Med 158: 981-988 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bell, M. R., Grill, D. E., Garratt, K. N., Berger, P. B., Gersh, B. J., Holmes, D. R. Jr (1995). Long-term Outcome of Women Compared With Men After Successful Coronary Angioplasty. Circulation 91: 2876-2881 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Patrick, S. J., Concato, J., Viscoli, C., Chyatte, D., Brass, L. M. (1995). Sex Differences in the Management of Patients Hospitalized With Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease. Stroke 26: 577-580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Vaccarino, V., Krumholz, H. M., Berkman, L. F., Horwitz, R. I. (1995). Sex Differences in Mortality After Myocardial Infarction : Is There Evidence for an Increased Risk for Women?. Circulation 91: 1861-1871 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hendel, R. C., Chen, M. H., L'Italien, G. J., Newell, J. B., Paul, S. D., Eagle, K. A., Leppo, J. A. (1995). Sex Differences in Perioperative and Long-term Cardiac Event–Free Survival in Vascular Surgery Patients : An Analysis of Clinical and Scintigraphic Variables. Circulation 91: 1044-1051 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, D. D., Shaw, L. (1994). Sex Bias in the Care of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease?. NEJM 331: 883-883 [Full Text]  
• Jackson, G (1994). Coronary artery disease and women. BMJ 309: 555-557 [Full Text]