The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:242-248 January 27, 1994 Number 4
NextNext

Results of Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Gerald W. Chodak, Ronald A. Thisted, Glenn S. Gerber, Jan-Erik Johansson, Jan Adolfsson, George W. Jones, Geoff D. Chisholm, Boaz Moskovitz, Pinhas M. Livne, and John Warner

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The selection of treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer requires reliable information about the outcome of conservative management. Previous studies of this question are generally considered unreliable because they were uncontrolled and nonrandomized.

Methods We performed a pooled analysis of 828 case records from six nonrandomized studies, published since 1985, of men treated conservatively (with observation and delayed hormone therapy but no radical surgery or irradiation) for clinically localized prostate cancer. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine which factors influenced survival among patients who did not die of causes other than prostate cancer (disease-specific survival). Kaplan-Meier curves for overall and metastasis-free survival among such patients were compared with use of the log-rank method and the Mantel-Haenszel test.

Results Factors that had a significant effect on disease-specific survival were grade 3 tumors (risk ratio, 10.04), residence in Israel (risk ratio, 2.48) or New York (risk ratio, 0.37), and age under 61 years (risk ratio, 0.32). Ten years after diagnosis, disease-specific survival (with data on men who died from causes other than prostate cancer censored) was 87 percent for men with grade 1 or 2 tumors and 34 percent for those with grade 3 tumors; metastasis-free survival among men who had not died of other causes was 81 percent for grade 1, 58 percent for grade 2, and 26 percent for grade 3 disease. These findings were not affected by the inclusion of men who had early-stage cancer, were older, had worse-than-average health, or underwent delayed radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy.

Conclusions The strategy of initial conservative management and delayed hormone therapy is a reasonable choice for some men with grade 1 or 2 clinically localized prostate cancer, particularly for those who have an average life expectancy of 10 years or less. New treatment strategies are needed for men with grade 3 prostate cancer.


Source Information

From the Departments of Surgery (G.W.C., G.S.G.), Statistics (R.A.T.), Anesthesia and Critical Care (R.A.T.), and the Cancer Research Center (R.A.T.), University of Chicago-Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago; the Department of Urology, Orebro Medical Center Hospital, and the Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden (J.-E.J.); the Department of Urology, Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska, Sweden (J.A.); the Division of Urology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, D.C. (G.W.J.); the Department of Surgery-Urology, University of Edinburgh-Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland (G.D.C.); the Department of Urology, Rambam Medical Center and Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (B.M., P.M.L.); and the Urology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York (J.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Chodak at the University of Chicago Hospitals, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Prostate and Urology Center, 4646 N. Marine Dr., Chicago, IL 60640.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Conservative Management of Prostate Cancer
Catalona W. J., Scardino P. T., Beck J. R., Miles B. J., Chodak G. W., Thisted R. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1830-1832, Jun 23, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.