The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 330:403-408 February 10, 1994 Number 6
NextNext

Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Maryland
Claudia A. Steiner, Eric B. Bass, Mark A. Talamini, Henry A. Pitt, and Earl P. Steinberg

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Since 1989, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been widely adopted as a treatment for gallstone disease. We analyzed the association between the introduction of this procedure and three variables: the rate at which cholecystectomy was performed in Maryland, the characteristics of patients undergoing cholecystectomy in routine clinical practice, and operative mortality.

Methods and Results We used 1985-1992 hospital-discharge data from all 54 acute care hospitals in Maryland to identify open and laparoscopic cholecystectomies, characteristics of patients undergoing these procedures, and deaths occurring during hospitalizations in which these procedures were performed. The annual rate of cholecystectomy, adjusted for age, rose from 1.69 per 1000 state residents in 1987-1989 to 2.17 per 1000 residents in 1992, an increase of 28 percent (P<0.001). As compared with patients undergoing open cholecystectomy, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy tended to be younger, less likely to have acute cholecystitis or a common-duct stone, and more likely to be white and have private health insurance or belong to a health maintenance organization (P<0.001). Although the operative mortality associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy was less than that with open cholecystectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.37) and the overall mortality rate for all cholecystectomies declined from 0.84 percent in 1989 to 0.56 percent in 1992, there was no significant change in the total number of cholecystectomy-related operative deaths because of the increase in the cholecystectomy rate.

Conclusions In Maryland, although the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accompanied by a 33 percent decrease in overall operative mortality per procedure, the total number of cholecystectomy-related deaths has not fallen because of a 28 percent increase in the total rate of cholecystectomy.


Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (C.A.S., E.B.B., E.P.S.) and Surgery (M.A.T., H.A.P.), School of Medicine, and the Department of Health Policy and Management (E.B.B., E.P.S.), School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Steinberg at Johns Hopkins University, Program for Medical Technology and Practice Assessment, 1830 E. Monument St., Rm. 8068, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Zahedi T., Steiner C. A., Bass E. B., Steinberg E. P.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1994; 331:54-55, Jul 7, 1994. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.