The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 331:700-705 September 15, 1994 Number 11
NextNext

Effects of Reducing or Discontinuing Inhaled Budesonide in Patients with Mild Asthma
Tari Haahtela, Markku Jarvinen, Tuomo Kava, Kirsti Kiviranta, Sirkka Koskinen, Kaarina Lehtonen, Kurt Nikander, Tore Persson, Olof Selroos, Anssi Sovijarvi, Brita Stenius-Aarniala, Thore Svahn, Ritva Tammivaara, and Lauri A. Laitinen

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background In a previous study, we found that two years of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, was more effective than treatment with an inhaled {beta}2-agonist, terbutaline, in patients with newly diagnosed, generally mild asthma. We continued this study for a third year to investigate whether the steroid dose could be reduced or discontinued and what effect crossover of patients from {beta}2-agonist therapy to corticosteroid therapy would have.

Methods A total of 37 patients treated for two years with inhaled budesonide at a dose of 1200 µg per day were randomly assigned to treatment with 400 µg of budesonide per day (19 patients) or placebo (18 patients) in a double-blind manner. Another 37 patients, who had received terbutaline during the first two years, were crossed over in an open-label manner to treatment with 1200 µg of budesonide per day during the third year.

Results Treatment with the reduced dose of budesonide was sufficiently effective in 74 percent of the patients to maintain bronchial responsiveness at a level similar to that achieved with the higher dose. In contrast, improvement was maintained in only 33 percent of the patients receiving placebo, and the differences in pulmonary function between the steroid and placebo groups were significant (for forced expiratory volume in one second, P = 0.007; for bronchial responsiveness to histamine, P = 0.025; and for peak expiratory flow in the morning, P = 0.040). The condition of patients who were crossed over from terbutaline therapy to treatment with 1200 µg of budesonide per day improved. However, the degree of improvement in these patients appeared to be less than in those who were treated with budesonide at the beginning of the three-year study.

Conclusions Early treatment with inhaled budesonide results in long-lasting control of mild asthma. Maintenance therapy can usually be given at a reduced dose, but discontinuation of treatment is often accompanied by exacerbation of the disease.


Source Information

From Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (T.H., K.K., A.S., B.S.-A., L.A.L.); Kanta-Hame Central Hospital, Hameenlinna, Finland (M.J.); Pohjois-Karjala Central Hospital, Joensuu, Finland (T.K.); Kiljava Hospital, Kiljava, Finland (S.K., R.T.); Etela-Saimaa Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland (K.L.); and Astra Draco AB, Lund, Sweden (K.N., T.P., O.S., T.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Haahtela at the Department of Allergic Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahdentie 2, SF-00250 Helsinki, Finland.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Inhaled Budesonide for Mild Asthma
Geddes D. M., König P., Haahtela T., Laitinen L. A., Drazen J. M., Israel E.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 332:683-684, Mar 9, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.