The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 331:760-764 September 22, 1994 Number 12
NextNext

Equitable Allocation of HLA-Compatible Kidneys for Local Pools and for Minorities
Steve Takemoto, Paul I. Terasaki, David W. Gjertson, and J. Michael Cecka

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The methods used to allocate cadaveric kidneys in the United States have been criticized as being unfair to minorities because of an overemphasis on HLA matching. We evaluated a new HLA-matching method that might alleviate this problem.

Methods We used data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Kidney Transplant Registry to evaluate and project the outcome of cadaveric kidney transplantation. An HLA-matching method based on compatibility at 10 key amino acid residues of HLA-A and B molecules and a limited number of HLA-DR types was evaluated with use of the HLA types of the patients currently on the national waiting list and waiting lists in Los Angeles and Birmingham, Alabama.

Results With national kidney sharing, the projected 10-year rate of graft survival for transplants in which there were no HLA-A, B, or DR mismatches was 66 percent, as compared with 39 percent for transplants with more than two HLA-A, B, or DR mismatches. With local sharing, 43 percent of patients could be fully matched, and they had a projected 10-year graft-survival rate of 50 percent. When one HLA-DR mismatch was allowed, the projected 10-year graft survival was 46 percent, and 67 percent of patients waiting locally could receive such grafts. Even in Alabama, where 68 percent of the patients on the waiting list are black, 48 percent of waiting patients could obtain a matched kidney.

Conclusions Inserting two new HLA-matching categories into the UNOS point system for cadaveric kidney allocation would increase the number of patients for whom matches could be found in local pools.


Source Information

From the Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Surgery, UCLA.

Address reprint requests to Mr. Takemoto at the UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 950 Veteran Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90024.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

HLA Matching in Renal Transplantation
Gaston R. S., Deierhoi M. H., Ayres I., Takemoto S., Terasaki P. I., Gjertson D. W., Cecka J. M., Held P. J., Port F. K., Hunsicker L. G., Kahan B. D., Sanfilippo F.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 332:752-753, Mar 16, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.