The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:700-705 March 16, 1995 Number 11
NextNext

A Randomized Trial Comparing Fluconazole with Clotrimazole Troches for the Prevention of Fungal Infections in Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
William G. Powderly, M.D., Dianne M. Finkelstein, Ph.D., Judith Feinberg, M.D., Peter Frame, M.D., Weili He, M.S., Charles van der Horst, M.D., Susan L. Koletar, M.D., M. Elaine Eyster, M.D., John Carey, M.D., Hetty Waskin, M.D., Thomas M. Hooton, M.D., Newton Hyslop, M.D., Stephen A. Spector, M.D., Samuel A. Bozzette, M.D., Ph.D., for The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Cryptococcal meningitis and other serious fungal infections are common complications in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Fluconazole is effective for long-term suppression of many fungal infections, but its effectiveness as primary prophylaxis had not been adequately evaluated.

Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized trial that compared fluconazole (200 mg per day) with clotrimazole troches (10 mg taken five times daily) in patients who were also participating in a randomized trial of primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

Results After a median follow-up of 35 months, invasive fungal infections had developed in 4.1 percent of the patients in the fluconazole group (9 of 217) and in 10.9 percent of those in the clotrimazole group (23 of 211; relative hazard, as adjusted for the CD4+ count, 3.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.6). Of the 32 invasive fungal infections, 17 were cryptococcosis (2 in the fluconazole group and 15 in the clotrimazole group; adjusted relative hazard, 8.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 37.6). The benefit of fluconazole was greater for the patients with 50 or fewer CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter than for the patients with higher counts. Fluconazole was also effective in preventing esophageal candidiasis (adjusted relative hazard, 5.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 20.0; P = 0.004) and confirmed and presumed oropharyngeal candidiasis (5.7 and 38.1 cases per 100 person-years of follow-up in the fluconazole and clotrimazole groups, respectively; P<0.001). Survival was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions Fluconazole taken prophylactically reduces the frequency of cryptococcosis, esophageal candidiasis, and superficial fungal infections in HIV-infected patients, especially those with 50 or fewer CD4+ lymphocytes per cubic millimeter, but the drug does not reduce overall mortality.


Source Information

From Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (W.G.P.); the Statistical and Data Analysis Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (D.M.F., W.H.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Bethesda, Md., and Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (J.F.); the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati (P.F.); the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (C.H.); Ohio State University, Columbus (S.L.K.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey (M.E.E.); Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland (J.C.); Duke University, Durham, N.C. (H.W.); the University of Washington, Seattle (T.M.H.); Tulane University, New Orleans (N.H.); the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (S.A.S., S.A.B.); the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego (S.A.B.); and RAND, Santa Monica, Calif. (S.A.B.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Bozzette at the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mail Code 111N-1, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.