The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:1345-1350 May 18, 1995 Number 20
NextNext

A Randomized Trial of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Care of Hospitalized Patients
David B. Reuben, M.D., Gerald M. Borok, Ph.D., Girma Wolde-Tsadik, Ph.D., Daniel H. Ershoff, Dr.P.H., Linda K. Fishman, L.C.S.W., Virginia L. Ambrosini, M.D., Yunbao Liu, M.S., Laurence Z. Rubenstein, M.D., and John C. Beck, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although many studies describe benefits from the comprehensive assessment of elderly patients by an interdisciplinary team (comprehensive geriatric assessment), the most supportive evidence for the process has come from programs that rely on specialized inpatient units and long hospital stays. We examined whether an inpatient geriatric consultation service might also be beneficial in a trial involving four medical centers of a group-practice health maintenance organization (HMO).

Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial with 2353 hospitalized patients 65 years of age or older in whom at least 1 of 13 screening criteria were present: stroke, immobility, impairment in any basic activity of daily living, malnutrition, incontinence, confusion or dementia, prolonged bed rest, recent falls, depression, social or family problems, an unplanned readmission to the hospital within three months of a previous hospital stay, a new fracture, and age of 80 years or older. Of the 1337 patients assigned to the experimental group, 1261 (94 percent) received a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the form of a consultation, with limited follow-up; the 1016 patients assigned to the control group received usual care. The functional and health status of the patients was measured at base line and 3 and 12 months later; survival was assessed at 12 months. Subgroups of patients who might be presumed to benefit from comprehensive assessment were also studied.

Results The survival rate at 12 months was 74 percent in the experimental group and 75 percent in the control group. At base line, 3 months, and 12 months the scores of the two groups on measures of functional and health status were similar. The analysis of 16 subgroups did not identify any with either clearly improved functional status or improved survival.

Conclusions In this HMO, comprehensive geriatric assessment by a consultation team, with limited follow-up, did not improve the health or survival of hospitalized patients selected on the basis of screening criteria.


Source Information

From the UCLA Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Los Angeles (D.B.R., L.Z.R., J.C.B.); and the Southern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Pasadena, Calif. (G.M.B., G.W.-T., D.H.E., L.K.F., V.L.A., Y.L.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Reuben at the Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, UCLA School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave., A665 Factor Bldg., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1687.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.