The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:1612-1617 June 15, 1995 Number 24
NextNext

Effect of a Prior-Authorization Requirement on the Use of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs by Medicaid Patients
Walter E. Smalley, M.D., Marie R. Griffin, M.D., M.P.H., Randy L. Fought, B.S., Leo Sullivan, D.Ph., and Wayne A. Ray, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Prior authorization — mandatory advance approval for the use of expensive medications — is now the primary method by which Medicaid programs control expenditures for drugs. However, whether this policy reduces expenditures for specific drugs without causing the unwanted substitution of other drugs or medical services has been largely unstudied. We evaluated the effects of a prior-authorization policy involving nongeneric nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the Medicaid program in Tennessee.

Methods We compared monthly Medicaid expenditures that were potentially affected by the policy change during the year before and the two years after its implementation. We studied prescriptions for NSAIDs, other analgesic or antiinflammatory drugs, and psychotropic drugs, as well as outpatient services and inpatient admissions for the management of pain or inflammation.

Results At the midpoint of the base-line year, 495,821 people were enrolled in Medicaid. During that year, mean annualized Medicaid expenditures for NSAID prescriptions amounted to $22.41. Expenditures decreased by 53 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 48 to 57 percent) during the next two years, for an estimated savings of $12.8 million. The reduction in expenditures resulted from the increased use of generic NSAIDs, as well as from a 19 percent decrease in overall NSAID use (95 percent confidence interval, 13 to 25 percent). There was no concomitant increase in Medicaid expenditures for other medical care. Regular users of nongeneric NSAIDs, those most affected by the policy change, had similar reductions in NSAID expenditures and use, with no increase in expenditures for other medical care.

Conclusions Prior-authorization requirements may be highly cost effective with regard to expenditures for NSAIDs, drugs that have very similar efficacy and safety but substantial variation in cost.


Source Information

From the Divisions of Gastroenterology (W.E.S.) and General Internal Medicine (M.R.G.), Department of Medicine, and the Department of Preventive Medicine (M.R.G., R.L.F., W.A.R.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; and the Tennessee State Department of Health, Bureau of TennCare (L.S.) — both in Nashville.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Smalley at the Department of Preventive Medicine, A-1124 MCN, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-2637.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Effect of a Prior-Authorization Requirement on the Use of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs
Lehmann D. F., Frey H. S., Smalley W. E., Griffin M. R., Ray W. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1289-1290, Nov 9, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.