The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:1666-1670 June 22, 1995 Number 25
NextNext

Silicone Breast Implants and the Risk of Connective-Tissue Diseases and Symptoms
Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero, M.D., Graham A. Colditz, M.B., B.S., Dr.P.H., Elizabeth W. Karlson, M.D., David J. Hunter, M.B., B.S., Sc.D., Frank E. Speizer, M.D., and Matthew H. Liang, M.D., M.P.H.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Silicone breast implants have been linked to a variety of illnesses, the most controversial of which are connective-tissue diseases and symptoms. To study this relation, we analyzed data from 14 years of follow-up of the Nurses' Health Study cohort.

Methods Women who were free from connective-tissue disease in June 1976 were followed through May 31, 1990, before there was widespread media coverage of the possible association of breast implants and connective-tissue diseases. Information was collected through biennial and supplementary mailed questionnaires and blinded reviews of medical records with the use of standardized criteria. Relative risk, the measure of association, was defined as the incidence rate of connective-tissue disease among women with breast implants divided by the corresponding incidence rate among women without breast implants.

Results Among 87,501 women who were eligible for follow-up, 516 were confirmed as having definite connective-tissue diseases and 1183 as having breast implants (of which 876 were silicone-gel–filled, 170 saline-filled, 67 double-lumen, 14 polyurethane-coated, and 56 of unknown type). The mean (±SD) period of follow-up after surgery was 9.9±6.4 years (range, 1 month to 40.5 years). Three of the patients with definite connective-tissue disease — all had rheumatoid arthritis — had implants (one silicone-gel–filled, one saline-filled, and one double-lumen). The age-adjusted relative risk of a definite connective-tissue disease among women with any type of implant was 0.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 2.0), as compared with women without implants. For women with silicone-gel–filled implants, the comparable relative risk was 0.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 1.9). The relative risk of self-reported signs or symptoms of connective-tissue disease for women with implants was 1.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.4); the risk of having any 1 of 41 signs, symptoms, or laboratory features of connective-tissue disease was 0.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.6).

Conclusions In a large cohort study, we did not find an association between silicone breast implants and connective-tissue diseases, defined according to a variety of standardized criteria, or signs and symptoms of these diseases.


Source Information

From the Departments of Rheumatology and Immunology (J.S.-G., E.W.K., M.H.L.) and Medicine (G.A.C., D.J.H., F.E.S., M.H.L.), Harvard Medical School; the Robert B. Brigham Multipurpose Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Center (J.S.-G., E.W.K., M.H.L.) and the Channing Laboratory (G.A.C., D.J.H., F.E.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital; and the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health (G.A.C., D.J.H.) — all in Boston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Liang at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dept. of Rheumatology and Immunology, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Breast Implants and Connective-Tissue Diseases
Vasey F. B., Aziz N., Abraham J. L., van Vollenhoven R., Liang M. H., Karlson E. W., Sánchez-Guerrero J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1423-1424, Nov 23, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.