The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 332:488-493 February 23, 1995 Number 8
NextNext

The Effect of Cholesterol-Lowering and Antioxidant Therapy on Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion
Todd J. Anderson, M.D., Ian T. Meredith, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Alan C. Yeung, M.D., Balz Frei, Ph.D., Andrew P. Selwyn, M.D., and Peter Ganz, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Patients with coronary artery disease and abnormalities of serum lipid levels often have endothelial vasodilator dysfunction, which may contribute to ischemic cardiac events. Whether cholesterol-lowering or antioxidant therapy can restore endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilatation is unknown.

Methods We randomly assigned 49 patients (mean [±SD] serum cholesterol level, 209±33 mg per deciliter [5.40±0.85 mmol per liter]) to receive one of three treatments: an American Heart Association Step 1 diet (the diet group, 11 patients); lovastatin and cholestyramine (the low-density lipoprotein [LDL]–lowering group, 21 patients); or lovastatin and probucol (the LDL-lowering–antioxidant group, 17 patients). Endothelium-dependent coronary-artery vasomotion in response to an intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine (10-8 to 10-6 M) was assessed at base line and after one year of therapy. Vasoconstrictor responses to these doses of acetylcholine are considered to be abnormal.

Results Treatment resulted in significant reductions in LDL cholesterol levels of 41±22 percent in the LDL-lowering–antioxidant group and 38±20 percent in the LDL-lowering group (P<0.001 vs. the diet group). The maximal changes in coronary-artery diameter with acetylcholine at base line and at follow-up were -19 and -2 percent, respectively, in the LDL-lowering–antioxidant group, -15 and -6 percent in the LDL-lowering group, and -14 and -19 percent in the diet group (P<0.01 for the LDL-lowering–antioxidant group vs. the diet group; P = 0.08 for the LDL-lowering group vs. the diet group). (The negative numbers indicate vasoconstriction.) Thus, the greatest improvement in the vasoconstrictor response was seen in the LDL-lowering–antioxidant group.

Conclusions The improvement in endothelium-dependent vasomotion with cholesterol-lowering and antioxidant therapy may have important implications for the activity of myocardial ischemia and may explain in part the reduced incidence of adverse coronary events that is known to result from cholesterol-lowering therapy.


Source Information

From the Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (T.J.A., I.T.M., A.C.Y., A.P.S., P.G.), and the Department of Medicine and Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine (B.F.) — all in Boston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Anderson at the Cardiovascular Division, 8th Floor, Foothills Hospital, 1403 29th St. N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Cholesterol Lowering and Coronary Vasomotion
Jialal I., Anderson T., Meredith I. T., Ganz P.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1995; 333:324-325, Aug 3, 1995. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.