The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1996;334(11):743.

Original Article
Volume 333:817-822 September 28, 1995 Number 13
NextNext

Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Laurent Brochard, M.D., Jordi Mancebo, M.D., Marc Wysocki, M.D., Frédéric Lofaso, M.D., Giorgio Conti, M.D., Alain Rauss, M.D., Gérald Simonneau, M.D., Salvador Benito, M.D., Alessandro Gasparetto, M.D., François Lemaire, M.D., Daniel Isabey, Ph.D., and Alain Harf, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background In patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, noninvasive ventilation may be used in an attempt to avoid endotracheal intubation and complications associated with mechanical ventilation.

Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized study comparing noninvasive pressure-support ventilation delivered through a face mask with standard treatment in patients admitted to five intensive care units over a 15-month period.

Results A total of 85 patients were recruited from a larger group of 275 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to the intensive care units in the same period. A total of 42 were randomly assigned to standard therapy and 43 to noninvasive ventilation. The two groups had similar clinical characteristics on admission to the hospital. The use of noninvasive ventilation significantly reduced the need for endotracheal intubation (which was dictated by objective criteria): 11 of 43 patients (26 percent) in the noninvasive-ventilation group were intubated, as compared with 31 of 42 (74 percent) in the standard-treatment group (P<0.001). In addition, the frequency of complications was significantly lower in the noninvasive-ventilation group (16 percent vs. 48 percent, P = 0.001), and the mean (±SD) hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (23±17 days vs. 35±33 days, P = 0.005). The in-hospital mortality rate was also significantly reduced with noninvasive ventilation (4 of 43 patients, or 9 percent, in the noninvasive-ventilation group died in the hospital, as compared with 12 of 42, or 29 percent, in the standard-treatment group; P = 0.02).

Conclusions In selected patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, noninvasive ventilation can reduce the need for endotracheal intubation, the length of the hospital stay, and the in-hospital mortality rate.


Source Information

From the Medical Intensive Care Unit and INSERM, Unité 296, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France (L.B., A.R., F. Lemaire, D.I., A.H.); the Intensive Care Unit, International Hospital of the University of Paris, Paris (M.W.); the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France (F. Lofaso, G.S.); the Medical Intensive Care Unit, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain (J.M., S.B.); and the Intensive Care Unit, La Sapienza University Hospital, Rome (G.C., A.G.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Brochard at Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil CEDEX, France.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Noninvasive Ventilation for Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Baumel M. J., Schwab R. J., Collman R. G., Brochard L., Mancebo J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1996; 334:735-736, Mar 14, 1996. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.