The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 333:420-425 August 17, 1995 Number 7
NextNext

Ehrlichiosis in a Golf-Oriented Retirement Community
Steven M. Standaert, M.D., Jacqueline E. Dawson, M.S., William Schaffner, M.D., James E. Childs, Sc.D., Kristine L. Biggie, B.S., Joseph Singleton, B.S., Reid R. Gerhardt, Ph.D., Marilyn L. Knight, B.S., and Robert H. Hutcheson, M.D., M.P.H.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Ehrlichiosis due to Ehrlichia chaffeensis usually occurs sporadically or in small clusters, with an annual incidence estimated at 3 to 5 cases per 100,000 population in areas of endemic disease. The putative principal vector is the Lone Star tick (Amblyomma americanum). We investigated an outbreak of ehrlichiosis that occurred in June 1993 among members of a golf-oriented retirement community (community A) in Tennessee. The community is densely wooded and borders a wildlife-management area where deer are numerous.

Methods We conducted a case–control study, using medical-history reviews, serologic testing, and testing with the polymerase chain reaction for E. chaffeensis infection. We also surveyed a sample of 10 percent of the households in community A and in another golf-oriented community (community B) more than 20 miles (32 km) from the wildlife-management area. Survey participants completed a questionnaire and provided specimens for serologic testing. In both communities, searches for ticks were undertaken.

Results Eleven cases of symptomatic ehrlichiosis were identified in the case–control study, 10 of which were in community A (attack rate, 330 per 100,000). Of 311 surveyed residents of community A, 12.5 percent had serologic evidence of past E. chaffeensis infection, as compared with 3.3 percent of 92 in community B (relative risk in community A as compared with community B, 3.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 12.2). The risk of infection was associated with tick bites, exposure to wildlife, golfing, and among golfers, retrieving lost golf balls from the rough. Persons who never used insect repellent were more likely to have had infection than persons who did. In community A, thousands of Lone Star ticks were found; in community B, only three ticks were found.

Conclusions The high rate of E. chaffeensis infection in community A resulted from its proximity to a wildlife reserve. When outdoor recreational activities are common and concentrations of ticks are high, outbreaks of arthropod-borne zoonoses can be anticipated.


Source Information

From the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Field Epidemiology, Epidemiology Program Office (S.M.S.), and the Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases (J.E.D., J.E.C., K.L.B., J.S.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (W.S.) and the Tennessee Department of Health (R.H.H.), both in Nashville; the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (R.R.G.); and the Tennessee Valley Authority, Land between the Lakes, Golden Pond, Ky. (M.L.K.). Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Epidemic Intelligence Service Conference, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, April 18, 1994, and the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Orlando, Fla., October 9, 1994.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Schaffner at the Department of Preventive Medicine, A-1124 MCN, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-2637.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.