The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 334:635-642 March 7, 1996 Number 10
NextNext

Effect of a Copayment on Use of the Emergency Department in a Health Maintenance Organization
Joe V. Selby, M.D., M.P.H., Bruce H. Fireman, M.A., and Bix E. Swain, M.S.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Use of the emergency department for nonemergency care is frequent and costly. We studied the effect of a copayment on emergency department use in a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO).

Methods We examined the use of the emergency department in 1992 and 1993 by 30,276 subjects who ranged in age from 1 to 63 years at the start of the study and belonged to the Kaiser Permanente HMO in northern California. We assessed their use of various HMO services and their clinical outcomes before and after the introduction of a copayment of $25 to $35 for using the emergency department. This copayment group was compared with two randomly selected control groups not affected by the copayment. One control group, with 60,408 members, was matched for age, sex, and area of residence to the copayment group. The second, with 37,539 members, was matched for these factors and also for the type of employer.

Results After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and use of the emergency department in 1992, the decline in the number of visits in 1993 was 14.6 percentage points greater in the copayment group than in either control group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visits for urgent care did not increase among subjects in any stratum defined by age and sex, and neither did the number of outpatient visits by adults and children. The decline in emergency visits for presenting conditions classified as "always an emergency" was small and not significant. For conditions classified as "often an emergency," "sometimes not an emergency," or "often not an emergency," the declines in the use of the emergency department were larger and statistically significant, and they increased with decreasing severity of the presenting condition. Although our ability to detect any adverse effects of the copayment was limited, there was no suggestion of excess adverse events in the copayment group, such as increases in mortality or in the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations.

Conclusions Among members of an HMO, the introduction of a small copayment for the use of the emergency department was associated with a decline of about 15 percent in the use of that department, mostly among patients with conditions considered likely not to present an emergency.


Source Information

From the Division of Research, Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, 3505 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611, where reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Selby.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Costs of Visits to Emergency Departments
Baier C. L., Auerbach S. B., Becker K. A., Hearst N., Lucey C., Williams R. M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1996; 335:209-211, Jul 18, 1996. Correspondence

Insurance Copayments and Delays in Seeking Emergency Care
Soumerai S. B., Ross-Degnan D., Taylor J. M., Magid D. J., Koepsell T. D., Wagner E. H., Weaver W. D.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1247-1248, Oct 23, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.