The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 334:1635-1641 June 20, 1996 Number 25
NextNext

The Influence of the Wider Use of Surfactant Therapy on Neonatal Mortality among Blacks and Whites
Aaron Hamvas, M.D., Paul H. Wise, M.D., M.P.H., Robert K. Yang, B.A., Nina S. Wampler, M.S., M.P.H., Akihiko Noguchi, M.D., Michael M. Maurer, M.D., Corinne A. Walentik, M.D., M.P.H., Wayne F. Schramm, M.A., and F. Sessions Cole, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Surfactant therapy reduces morbidity and mortality among premature infants with the respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Fetal pulmonary surfactant matures more slowly in white than in black fetuses, and therefore RDS is more prevalent among whites than among blacks. We reasoned that the increased use of surfactant after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1990 might have reduced neonatal mortality more among whites than among blacks.

Methods We merged vital-statistics information for all 1563 infants with very low birth weights (500 to 1500 g) born from 1987 through 1989 or in 1991 and 1992 to residents of St. Louis with clinical data from the four neonatal intensive care units in the St. Louis area; we then compared neonatal mortality during two periods, one before and one after the FDA's approval of surfactant for clinical use (1987 through 1989 and 1991 through 1992).

Results The use of surfactant increased by a factor of 10 between 1987 through 1989 and 1991 through 1992. The neonatal mortality rate among all very-low-birth-weight infants decreased 17 percent, from 220.3 deaths per 1000 very-low-birth-weight babies born alive (in 1987 through 1989) to 183.9 per 1000 (in 1991 through 1992; P = 0.07). This decrease was due to a 41 percent reduction in the mortality rate among white newborns with very low birth weights (from 261.5 per 1000 to 155.5 per 1000; P = 0.003). In contrast, among black infants, the mortality rate for very-low-birth-weight infants did not change significantly (195.6 per 1000 and 196.8 per 1000). The relative risk of death among black newborns with very low birth weights as compared with white newborns with similar weights was 0.7 from 1987 through 1989 and 1.3 from 1991 through 1992 (P = 0.02). The differences in mortality were not explained by differences in access to surfactant therapy, by differences in mortality between black and white infants who received surfactant, or by differences in the use of antenatal corticosteroid therapy.

Conclusions After surfactant therapy for RDS became generally available, neonatal mortality improved more for white than for black infants with very low birth weights.


Source Information

From the Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, and St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis (A.H., R.K.Y., F.S.C.); the Harvard Institute for Reproductive and Child Health, Joint Program in Neonatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston (P.H.W., N.S.W.); the Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis (A.N.); St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis (M.M.M.); St. Louis Regional Medical Center, St. Louis (C.A.W.); and the Missouri State Department of Health, Jefferson City (W.F.S.). Presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Research, Seattle, May 2–5, 1994 (Pediatr Res 1994;35:272A).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hamvas at the Division of Newborn Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Pl., St. Louis, MO 63110.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.