The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:27-31 July 4, 1996 Number 1
NextNext

Surveillance and Prevention of Residential-Fire Injuries
Sue Mallonee, R.N., M.P.H., Gregory R. Istre, M.D., Mark Rosenberg, M.D., M.P.P., Malinda Reddish-Douglas, M.P.H., Fred Jordan, M.D., Paul Silverstein, M.D., and William Tunell, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The majority of severe and fatal burn injuries result from residential fires. We studied the effectiveness of a smoke-alarm–giveaway program in the prevention of burn injuries in an area with a high rate of such injuries.

Methods We collected data on burn injuries in Oklahoma City from September 1987 through April 1990. The target area for the intervention was an area of 24 square miles (62 km2) with the highest rate of injuries related to residential fires in the city. We distributed smoke alarms door to door in the target area and then surveyed alarm use and function in a sample of the homes that had received an alarm. We also calculated the rates of fire injury per 100,000 population and per 100 fires for both the target area and the rest of the city before and after the smoke-alarm giveaway.

Results Before the intervention the rate of burn injuries per 100,000 population was 4.2 times higher in the target area than in the rest of Oklahoma City. An initial survey indicated that 11,881 of the 34,945 homes in the target area (34 percent) did not have smoke alarms. A total of 10,100 smoke alarms were distributed to 9291 homes; 45 percent were functioning four years later. The annualized fire-injury rates declined by 80 percent in the target area during the four years after the intervention (from 15.3 to 3.1 per 100,000 population), as compared with a small increase in the rest of the city (from 3.6 to 3.9 per 100,000 population). There was also a 74 percent decline in the target area in the injury rate per 100 fires (from 5.0 to 1.3; rate ratio, 0.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.6), as compared with a small increase in the rest of the city.

Conclusions A targeted intervention involving a smoke-alarm–giveaway program can reduce the incidence of injuries from residential fires.


Source Information

From the Injury Prevention Service (S.M., M.R.-D.) and the Epidemiology Service (G.R.I.), Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City; the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (M.R.); and the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (F.J.), Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma (P.S.), and Children's Hospital of Oklahoma (W.T.) — all in Oklahoma City.

Address reprint requests to Ms. Mallonee at the Injury Prevention Service–0307, Oklahoma State Department of Health, 1000 NE 10th, Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1299.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.