The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 335:1198-1205 October 17, 1996 Number 16
NextNext

Determinants of the Use of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization after Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Louise Pilote, M.D., M.P.H., Dave P. Miller, M.S., Robert M. Califf, M.D., J. Sunil Rao, Ph.D., W. Douglas Weaver, M.D., and Eric J. Topol, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Clinical trials and practice guidelines have identified clinical criteria for the use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. The effect of these criteria on clinical practice has not been extensively evaluated.

Methods We used classification-and-regression-tree (CART) and logistic-regression models to study the patients in the first Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries trial, to identify the variables that best predicted the use of angiography and revascularization procedures after thrombolysis.

Results Among the 21,772 U.S. patients in the trial, 71 percent underwent coronary angiography before discharge from the hospital. Of these, 58 percent underwent revascularization (73 percent receiving angioplasty). The CART model for the use of angiography showed that age was the variable most predictive of angiography; only 53 percent of patients at least 73 years of age underwent angiography, as compared with 76 percent of those under 73. Among the older patients, age was again the most predictive factor; among the younger patients, the availability of angioplasty was a more important predictor (67 percent of patients in hospitals without angioplasty facilities underwent angiography, as compared with 83 percent in hospitals with such facilities). The next most important variable was recurrent ischemia, which was more predictive at hospitals without angioplasty facilities than at those with them. Both statistical models identified coronary anatomy as the most important predictor of the use and type of revascularization.

Conclusions More patients treated with thrombolysis underwent angiography and revascularization before discharge than might be expected. Younger age and the availability of the procedures appeared to be the major determinants of the use of coronary angiography, whereas coronary anatomy largely determined the use and type of revascularization. This process appeared to select low-risk patients for intervention rather than those at higher risk, who would be the most likely to benefit.


Source Information

From Montreal General Hospital, Montreal (L.P.); the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland (D.P.M., J.S.R., E.J.T.); Duke University, Durham, N.C. (R.M.C.); and the University of Washington, Seattle (W.D.W.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Topol at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Use of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Abrams J., Pilote L., Califf R. M., Topol E. J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1024-1025, Apr 3, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.