FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 335:1963-1967 December 26, 1996 Number 26 Next

	Full Text PDF Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background We have previously shown that in New York State the initiation of malpractice suits correlates poorly with the actual occurrence of adverse events (injuries resulting from medical treatment) and negligence. There is little information on the outcome of such lawsuits, however. To assess the ability of malpractice litigation to make accurate determinations, we studied 51 malpractice suits to identify factors that predict payment to plaintiffs.

Methods Among malpractice claims that we reviewed independently in an earlier study, we identified 51 litigated claims and followed them over a 10-year period to determine whether the malpractice insurer had closed the case. We obtained detailed summaries of the cases from the insurers and reviewed the litigation files if the outcome of a case differed from the outcome predicted in our original review.

Results Of the 51 malpractice cases, 46 had been closed as of December 31, 1995. Among these cases, 10 of 24 that we originally identified as involving no adverse event were settled for the plaintiffs (mean payment, $28,760), as were 6 of 13 cases classified as involving adverse events but no negligence (mean payment, $98,192) and 5 of 9 cases in which adverse events due to negligence were found in our assessment (mean payment, $66,944). Seven of eight claims involving permanent disability were settled for the plaintiffs (mean payment, $201,250). In a multivariate analysis, disability (permanent vs. temporary or none) was the only significant predictor of payment (P = 0.03). There was no association between the occurrence of an adverse event due to negligence (P = 0.32) or an adverse event of any type (P = 0.79) and payment.

Conclusions Among the malpractice claims we studied, the severity of the patient's disability, not the occurrence of an adverse event or an adverse event due to negligence, was predictive of payment to the plaintiff.

Source Information

From the Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, where reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Brennan.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bernstein, J., MacCourt, D., Abramson, B. D. (2008). Topics in Medical Economics: Medical Malpractice. JBJS 90: 1777-1782 [Full Text]  
• Morris, L. G. T., Ziff, D. J. S., DeLacure, M. D. (2008). Malpractice Litigation After Surgical Injury of the Spinal Accessory Nerve: An Evidence-Based Analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134: 102-107 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Berlin, L. (2007). Radiologic Errors and Malpractice: A Blurry Distinction. Am. J. Roentgenol. 189: 517-522 [Full Text]  
• Crosby, E. (2007). Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: literature review and role of the expert witness: [Fautes medicales et anesthesiologie : revue de la litterature et role du temoin expert]. Canadian J. Anesthesia 54: 227-241 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kane, R. L., Mosser, G. (2007). The challenge of explaining why quality improvement has not done better. Int J Qual Health Care 19: 8-10 [Full Text]  
• Glick, T. H., Rizzo, M., Stern, B. J., Feinberg, D. M. (2006). Neurologists for patient safety: Where we stand, time to deliver. Neurology 67: 2119-2123 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stripe, S. C., Best, L. G., Cole-Harding, S., Fifield, B., Talebdoost, F. (2006). Aviation Model Cognitive Risk Factors Applied to Medical Malpractice Cases. J Am Board Fam Med 19: 627-632 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hankins, G. D. V., MacLennan, A. H., Speer, M. E., Strunk, A., Nelson, K. (2006). Obstetric Litigation Is Asphyxiating Our Maternity Services.. Obstet Gynecol 107: 1382-1385 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., Gawande, A. A., Gandhi, T. K., Kachalia, A., Yoon, C., Puopolo, A. L., Brennan, T. A. (2006). Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.. NEJM 354: 2024-2033 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Murff, H J, France, D J, Blackford, J, Grogan, E L, Yu, C, Speroff, T, Pichert, J W, Hickson, G B (2006). Relationship between patient complaints and surgical complications. Qual Saf Health Care 15: 13-16 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roberts, R. G (2005). Montezuma's treasure. BMJ 331: E395-E396 [Full Text]  
• Gallagher, T. H., Levinson, W. (2005). Disclosing Harmful Medical Errors to Patients: A Time for Professional Action. Arch Intern Med 165: 1819-1824 [Full Text]  
• Kachalia, A., Choudhry, N. K., Studdert, D. M. (2005). Physician Responses to the Malpractice Crisis: From Defense to Offense. J Law Med Ethics 33: 416-428  
• Baker, T. (2005). Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study Conclusions about the Validity of Medical Malpractice Claims. J Law Med Ethics 33: 501-514  
• Schmidek, J M, Weeks, W B (2005). Relationship between tort claims and patient incident reports in the Veterans Health Administration. Qual Saf Health Care 14: 117-122 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Berlin, L. (2004). Outcome Bias. Am. J. Roentgenol. 183: 557-560 [Full Text]  
• Berlin, L. (2004). Fear of Cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 183: 267-272 [Full Text]  
• Struve, C. T. (2004). Improving The Medical Malpractice Litigation Process. Health Aff (Millwood) 23: 33-41 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Anderson, R. E. (2004). Defending the Practice of Medicine. Arch Intern Med 164: 1173-1178 [Full Text]  
• Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., Brennan, T. A. (2004). Medical Malpractice. NEJM 350: 283-292 [Full Text]  
• Dwyer, J., Shih, A. (2003). The Ethics of Tailoring the Patient's Chart. Focus 1: 422-426 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Berlin, L., Ikeda, D. M., Birdwell, R. L., O'Shaughnessy, K. F., Brenner, R. J., Sickles, E. A. (2003). Missed Mammographic Abnormalities, Malpractice, and Expert Witnesses: Does Majority Rule in the Courtroom? [letter] * Dr Ikeda and colleagues respond:. Radiology 229: 288-289 [Full Text]  
• Brennan, T. A., Mello, M. M. (2003). Patient Safety and Medical Malpractice: A Case Study. ANN INTERN MED 139: 267-273 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Davis, P, Lay-Yee, R, Briant, R, Scott, A (2003). Preventable in-hospital medical injury under the "no fault" system in New Zealand. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 251-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sage, W. M. (2003). Medical Liability And Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood) 22: 26-36 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Berlin, L. (2003). CT Versus Radiography for Initial Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma: What Is the Standard of Care?. Am. J. Roentgenol. 180: 911-915 [Full Text]  
• Rothschild, J. M., Federico, F. A., Gandhi, T. K., Kaushal, R., Williams, D. H., Bates, D. W. (2002). Analysis of Medication-Related Malpractice Claims: Causes, Preventability, and Costs. Arch Intern Med 162: 2414-2420 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Davis, P., Lay-Yee, R., Fitzjohn, J., Hider, P., Briant, R., Schug, S. (2002). Compensation for Medical Injury in New Zealand: Does "No-Fault" Increase the Level of Claims Making and Reduce Social and Clinical Selectivity?. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 27: 833-854 [Abstract]  
• Glazer, J. L., Sage, W. M. (2002). Malpractice Risk and Patient Complaints. JAMA 288: 1353-1354 [Full Text]  
• Lauer, M. S. (2002). Cardiologist on trial: reflections on credible evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 40: 563-564 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sage, W. M. (2002). Putting the Patient in Patient Safety: Linking Patient Complaints and Malpractice Risk. JAMA 287: 3003-3005 [Full Text]  
• Mueller, P. R., Berlin, L. (2002). Complications of Lung Abscess Aspiration and Drainage. Am. J. Roentgenol. 178: 1083-1086 [Full Text]  
• Sage, W. M. (2001). The Lawyerization of Medicine. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 26: 1179-1196  
• Sage, W. M. (2001). Principles, Pragmatism, and Medical Injury. JAMA 286: 226-228 [Full Text]  
• Glick, T. H. (2001). Malpractice claims: Outcome evidence to guide neurologic education?. Neurology 56: 1099-1100 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fanaeian, N., Merwin, E. (2001). Malpractice: Provider Risk or Consumer Protection?. American Journal of Medical Quality 16: 43-57 [Abstract]  
• Hughes, C. M., Honig, P., Phillips, J., Woodcock, J., Anderson, R. E., McDonald, C. J., Weiner, M., Hui, S. L. (2000). How Many Deaths Are Due to Medical Errors?. JAMA 284: 2187-2187 [Full Text]  
• Mohr, J. C. (2000). American Medical Malpractice Litigation in Historical Perspective. JAMA 283: 1731-1737 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gostin, L. (2000). A Public Health Approach to Reducing Error: Medical Malpractice as a Barrier. JAMA 283: 1742-1743 [Full Text]  
• Weingart, S. N, Wilson, R. M., Gibberd, R. W, Harrison, B. (2000). Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ 320: 774-777 [Full Text]  
• Anderson, R. E. (1999). Billions for Defense: The Pervasive Nature of Defensive Medicine. Arch Intern Med 159: 2399-2402 [Full Text]  
• Darchy, B., Le Miere, E., Figueredo, B., Bavoux, E., Domart, Y. (1999). Iatrogenic Diseases as a Reason for Admission to the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Causes, and Consequences. Arch Intern Med 159: 71-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Liang, B. A. (1999). Error in Medicine: Legal Impediments to U.S. Reform. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 24: 27-58 [Abstract]  
• Dwyer, J., Shih, A. (1998). The Ethics of Tailoring the Patient's Chart. Psychiatr. Serv. 49: 1309-1312 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meadow, W., Lantos, J. (1998). A Proactive, Data-based Determination of the Standard of Medical Care in Pediatrics. Pediatrics 101 : e6-e6 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brennan, T. A. (1998). More on Outcomes of Medical-Malpractice Litigation. NEJM 338: 690-690 [Full Text]  
• Anderson, R. E., Grove, E., Ferrara, M. A., Rubin, R. I., Brennan, T. A. (1997). Outcomes of Medical-Malpractice Litigation. NEJM 336: 1680-1681 [Full Text]