FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 335:476-482 August 15, 1996 Number 7 Next

	Full Text PDF Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Many hysterectomies are now performed by a laparoscopically assisted vaginal technique. This procedure is controversial, partly because of concern about cost. We studied hospital charges and costs for the procedure as compared with those for total abdominal hysterectomy and total vaginal hysterectomy in clinically similar groups of patients.

Methods From hospital-discharge data and patients' charts, we identified hysterectomies performed in 1993 and 1994 by 96 surgeons at a community teaching hospital to treat benign conditions. The patients were grouped according to the surgical procedures performed in conjunction with the hysterectomy. Data on hospital charges and cost-to-charge ratios for 64 hospital cost centers were used to assess charges and costs for specific resources, as well as for the hospitalization overall.

Results Of 1049 patients studied, 26 percent underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, 54 percent underwent abdominal hysterectomy, and 20 percent underwent vaginal hysterectomy. The average hospital stays were 2.6, 3.9, and 2.9 days, respectively, and the mean total charges (facility charges plus professional fees) for the hospitalizations were $6,116, $5,084, and $4,221 (P<0.001 for the comparison of the laparoscopic technique with both other techniques). The mean facility costs were $4,914, $3,954, and $3,116, respectively (P<0.001 for the same comparison), with similar findings in all subgroups. The higher charges and costs for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy were due to higher supply costs, particularly when disposable supplies were used, and to longer operating-room time.

Conclusions Despite shorter hospital stays, in-hospital charges and costs for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy are higher than for either alternative procedure, because of the disposable supplies that are typically used and the longer operating-room time.

Source Information

From the Department of Gynecology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore (J.H.D., P.M.H.); and Corning HTA, Washington, D.C. (R.I.G., M.M.M., E.P.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Dorsey at the Department of Gynecology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, 6569 N. Charles St., Suite 307, Baltimore, MD 21204.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Alternative Techniques of Hysterectomy
Porges R. F., Robinson J. W., Nisolle M., Donnez J., Osborne N. G., Kadar N., Reich H., Liu C.Y., Garry R., Dorsey J. H., Holtz P. M., Steinberg E. P., Weber A. M., Lee J.-c.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 336:290-293, Jan 23, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ruger, J. P. (2008). Ethics in American Health 2: An Ethical Framework for Health System Reform. AJPH 98: 1756-1763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roumm, A. R., Pizzi, L., Goldfarb, N. I., Cohn, H. (2005). Minimally Invasive: Minimally Reimbursed? An Examination of Six Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures. SURG INNOV 12: 261-287 [Abstract]  
• Hurskainen, R., Teperi, J., Rissanen, P., Aalto, A.-M., Grenman, S., Kivela, A., Kujansuu, E., Vuorma, S., Yliskoski, M., Paavonen, J. (2004). Clinical Outcomes and Costs With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System or Hysterectomy for Treatment of Menorrhagia: Randomized Trial 5-Year Follow-up. JAMA 291: 1456-1463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shushan, A., Mohamed, H., Magos, A. L. (1999). A case-control study to compare the variability of operating time in laparoscopic and open surgery. Hum Reprod 14: 1467-1469 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shushan, A., Mohamed, H., Magos, A. L. (1999). How long does laparoscopic surgery really take? Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies. Hum Reprod 14: 39-43 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Porges, R. F., Robinson, J. W., Nisolle, M., Donnez, J., Osborne, N. G., Kadar, N., Reich, H., Liu, C.Y., Garry, R., Dorsey, J. H., Holtz, P. M., Steinberg, E. P., Weber, A. M., Lee, J.-c. (1997). Alternative Techniques of Hysterectomy. NEJM 336: 290-293 [Full Text]  
• Stovall, T. G., Summitt, R. L. (1996). Laparoscopic Hysterectomy -- Is There a Benefit?. NEJM 335: 512-513 [Full Text]