The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 336:817-822 March 20, 1997 Number 12
NextNext

A Comparison of Coronary-Artery Stenting with Angioplasty for Isolated Stenosis of the Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery
Francesco Versaci, M.D., Achille Gaspardone, M.D., M.Phil., Fabrizio Tomai, M.D., Filippo Crea, M.D., Luigi Chiariello, M.D., and Pier A. Gioffrè, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Randomized studies have shown that the use of coronary-artery stenting as the initial treatment for coronary stenosis is associated with a lower risk of restenosis than is standard coronary angioplasty. We prospectively investigated the efficacy of these two approaches in selected patients with isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery.

Methods A total of 120 patients with isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery were randomly assigned to stent implantation or standard coronary angioplasty. The primary clinical end points were the rate of procedural success (defined as residual stenosis of less than 50 percent and the absence of death, myocardial infarction, and the need for coronary-artery bypass surgery during the hospital stay) and the rate of event-free survival (defined as freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and the recurrence of angina) at 12 months. The angiographic end point was the rate of restenosis 12 months after the procedure.

Results The two treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to demographic, clinical, or angiographic characteristics. The rates of procedural success were similar in the two groups of patients (95 percent in the stenting group vs. 93 percent in the angioplasty group, P = 0.98). The 12-month rates of event-free survival were 87 percent after stenting and 70 percent after angioplasty (P = 0.04). The rates of restenosis were 19 percent after stent implantation and 40 percent after angioplasty (P = 0.02).

Conclusions In patients with symptomatic isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, stenting had advantages over standard coronary angioplasty in that it was associated with both a lower rate of restenosis and a better clinical outcome.


Source Information

From the Servizio Speciale di Diagnosi e Cura di Emodinamica, Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Università di Roma Tor Vergata (F.V., A.G., F.T., L.C., P.A.G.); and the Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (F.C.) — both in Rome.

Address reprint requests to Professor Gioffrè at the Servizio Speciale di Diagnosi e Cura di Emodinamica, Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, via Portuense 700, 00149 Rome, Italy.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

A Comparison of Coronary-Artery Stenting with Angioplasty
Adelman A. G., Versaci F., Gaspardone A., Gioffrè P. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:277-278, Jul 24, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.