The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1997;337(2):139.

Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 336:1500-1505 May 22, 1997 Number 21
NextNext

Use of Cardiac Procedures and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Myocardial Infarction in the United States and Canada
Jack V. Tu, M.D., Ph.D., Chris L. Pashos, Ph.D., C. David Naylor, M.D., D.Phil., Erluo Chen, M.B., M.P.H., Sharon-Lise Normand, Ph.D., Joseph P. Newhouse, Ph.D., and Barbara J. McNeil, M.D., Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Acute myocardial infarction is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and Canada. We performed a population-based study to compare the use of cardiac procedures and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients in the two countries.

Methods We compared the use of invasive cardiac procedures and the mortality rates among 224,258 elderly Medicare beneficiaries in the United States and 9444 elderly patients in Ontario, Canada, each of whom had a new acute myocardial infarction in 1991.

Results The U.S. patients were significantly more likely than the Canadian patients to undergo coronary angiography (34.9 percent vs. 6.7 percent, P< 0.001), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (11.7 percent vs. 1.5 percent, P<0.001), and coronary-artery bypass surgery (10.6 percent vs. 1.4 percent, P<0.001) during the first 30 days after the index infarction. These differences in the use of cardiac procedures narrowed but persisted through 180 days of follow-up. The 30-day mortality rates were slightly but significantly lower for the U.S. patients than for the Canadian patients (21.4 percent vs. 22.3 percent, P = 0.03). However, the one-year mortality rates were virtually identical (34.3 percent in the United States vs. 34.4 percent in Ontario, P = 0.94).

Conclusions Short-term mortality after an acute myocardial infarction was slightly lower in the United States than in Ontario, but these differences did not persist through one year of follow-up. The strikingly higher rates of use of cardiac procedures in the United States, as compared with Canada, do not appear to result in better long-term survival rates for elderly U.S. patients with acute myocardial infarction.


Source Information

From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, North York, Ont., Canada (J.V.T., C.D.N., E.C.); the Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto (J.V.T., C.D.N.); Abt Associates, Cambridge, Mass. (C.L.P.); the Departments of Biostatistics (S.-L.N.) and Health Policy and Management (J.P.N.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; the Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, Mass. (J.P.N.); and the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (J.V.T., C.L.P., S.-L.N., J.P.N., B.J.M.). The opinions and conclusions in this study are those of the authors, and no official endorsement by the Ontario Ministry of Health is intended or should be inferred.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Tu at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G-106, 2075 Bayview Ave., North York, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Use of Cardiac Procedures in the United States and Canada
Green J., Wharton T. P., Tu J. V.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1008-1009, Oct 2, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.