The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:1124-1130 October 16, 1997 Number 16
NextNext

A Comparison of Continuous Infusion of Alteplase with Double-Bolus Administration for Acute Myocardial Infarction
The Continuous Infusion versus Double-Bolus Administration of Alteplase (COBALT) Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Accelerated infusion of alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator) over a period of 90 minutes induces more rapid lysis of coronary-artery thrombi than a 3-hour infusion. With two bolus doses of alteplase, further shortening the duration of administration, complete reperfusion was achieved in more than 85 percent of the patients in initial angiographic studies. We tested the hypothesis that double-bolus alteplase is at least as effective as accelerated infusion.

Methods In 398 hospitals, 7169 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to weight-adjusted, accelerated infusion of 100 mg of alteplase or to a bolus of 50 mg of alteplase over a period of 1 to 3 minutes followed 30 minutes later by a second bolus of 50 mg (or 40 mg for patients who weighed less than 60 kg). The primary end point was death from any cause at 30 days. The trial was stopped prematurely because of concern about the safety of the double-bolus injection.

Results Thirty-day mortality was higher in the double-bolus group than in the accelerated-infusion group: 7.98 percent as compared with 7.53 percent. The absolute difference was 0.44 percent, with a one-sided 95 percent upper boundary of 1.49 percent, which exceeded the prespecified upper limit of 0.40 percent to indicate equivalence in 30-day mortality between the two regimens. The respective rates of any stroke and of hemorrhagic stroke were 1.92 and 1.12 percent after double-bolus alteplase, as compared with 1.53 and 0.81 percent after an accelerated infusion of alteplase (P = 0.24 and P = 0.23, respectively).

Conclusions Double-bolus alteplase was not shown to be equivalent, according to the prespecified criteria, to accelerated infusion with regard to 30-day mortality. There was also a slightly higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage with the double-bolus method. Therefore, accelerated infusion of alteplase over a period of 90 minutes remains the preferred regimen.


Source Information

Dr. Van de Werf, as chairman of the trial, assumes full responsibility for the overall content and integrity of the manuscript.Presented in part at the 18th Congress of the European Society of Cardiology, Birmingham, United Kingdom, August 25–29, 1996, and the 69th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, New Orleans, November 10–13, 1996.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Frans Van de Werf at the Department of Cardiology, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.