The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:83-90 July 10, 1997 Number 2
NextNext

Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis with a Sustained-Release Ganciclovir Implant
David C. Musch, Ph.D., M.P.H., Daniel F. Martin, M.D., Judy F. Gordon, D.V.M., Matthew D. Davis, M.D., Baruch D. Kuppermann, M.D., Ph.D., for The Ganciclovir Implant Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Sustained-release, intraocular implants that deliver ganciclovir are an alternative method for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Methods We conducted a randomized study of 188 patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with an implant delivering 1 µg of ganciclovir per hour, an implant delivering 2 µg of ganciclovir per hour, or intravenous ganciclovir. The primary outcome we studied was progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis.

Results The median time to progression of retinitis was 221 days with the 1-µg-per-hour implant (75 eyes), 191 days with the 2-µg-per-hour implant (71 eyes), and 71 days with ganciclovir administered intravenously (76 eyes; P<0.001). The risk of progression of retinitis was almost three times as great among patients treated with intravenous ganciclovir as among those treated with a ganciclovir implant (risk ratio, 2.8; P<0.001). However, the risk of disease in the initially uninvolved eye was lower with intravenous ganciclovir than with a ganciclovir implant (risk ratio, 0.5; P = 0.19). Patients treated with intravenous ganciclovir were also less likely to have extraocular cytomegalovirus infections (0, vs. 10.3 percent in the two implant groups; P = 0.04).

Conclusions For the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis, the sustained-release ganciclovir implant is more effective than intravenous ganciclovir, but patients treated with a ganciclovir implant alone remain at greater risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease outside of the treated eye.


Source Information

From the Departments of Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (D.C.M.); the Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta (D.F.M.); Research and Development, Chiron Vision, Inc., Claremont, Calif. (J.F.G.); the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison (M.D.D.); and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Irvine (B.D.K.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Gordon at Chiron Vision, Inc., 9342 Jeronimo Rd., Irvine, CA 92718-1903.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.