The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 337:169-175 July 17, 1997 Number 3
NextNext

The Medicare-HMO Revolving Door — The Healthy Go in and the Sick Go Out
Robert O. Morgan, Ph.D., Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H., Carolee A. DeVito, Ph.D., M.P.H., and Nancy A. Persily, M.P.H.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Enrollment in Medicare health maintenance organizations (HMOs) is encouraged because of the expectation that HMOs can help slow the growth of Medicare costs. However, Medicare HMOs, which are paid 95 percent of average yearly fee-for-service Medicare expenditures, are increasingly believed to benefit from the selective enrollment of healthier Medicare recipients. Furthermore, whether sicker patients are more likely to disenroll from Medicare HMOs, thus raising average fee-for-service costs, is not clear.

Methods We used Medicare enrollment and inpatient billing records for southern Florida from 1990 through 1993 to examine differences in the use of inpatient medical services by 375,406 beneficiaries in the Medicare fee-for-service system, 48,380 HMO enrollees before enrollment, and 23,870 HMO enrollees after disenrollment. We also determined whether these differences were related to demographic characteristics and whether the pattern of use after disenrollment persisted over time.

Results The rate of use of inpatient services in the HMO-enrollment group during the year before enrollment was 66 percent of the rate in the fee-for-service group, whereas the rate in the HMO-disenrollment group after disenrollment was 180 percent of that in the fee-for-service group. Beneficiaries who disenrolled from HMOs re-enrolled at about the time that their level of use dropped to that in the fee-for-service group.

Conclusions These data show marked selection biases with respect to HMO enrollment and disenrollment. These biases undermine the effectiveness of the Medicare managed-care system and highlight the need for longitudinal and population-based studies.


Source Information

From the University of Miami School of Medicine and the Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center (R.O.M., B.A.V., C.A.D.); and the Michael I. Abrams Health Policy Research Center, University of Miami–Public Health Trust (R.O.M., B.A.V., C.A.D., N.A.P.) — all in Miami; and the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, D.C. (N.A.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Morgan at UM/PHT Health Policy Research Center, 630 Alton Rd., Suite 402, Miami Beach, FL 33139.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

The Medicare-HMO Revolving Door
Josephson D. G., Grana J. R., Hanchak N. A., Morgan R. O., Virnig B. A., DeVito C. A., Persily N. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1851-1852, Dec 18, 1997. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.