The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 338:1498-1505 May 21, 1998 Number 21
NextNext

A Comparison of Aspirin plus Tirofiban with Aspirin plus Heparin for Unstable Angina
The Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Study Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Letters
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Activation of platelets is central to the pathophysiology of unstable angina. We studied whether inhibition of the final common pathway for platelet aggregation with tirofiban, a nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, would improve clinical outcome in this condition.

Methods In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 3232 patients who were already receiving aspirin to additional treatment with intravenous tirofiban or heparin for 48 hours. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 48 hours.

Results The incidence of the composite end point was 32 percent lower at 48 hours in the group that received tirofiban (3.8 percent, vs. 5.6 percent with heparin; risk ratio, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 0.92; P=0.01). Percutaneous revascularization was performed in 1.9 percent of the patients during the first 48 hours. At 30 days, the frequency of the composite end point (with the addition of readmission for unstable angina) was similar in the two groups (15.9 percent in the tirofiban group vs. 17.1 percent in the heparin group, P=0.34). There was a trend toward a reduction in the rate of death or myocardial infarction with tirofiban (a rate of 5.8 percent, as compared with 7.1 percent in the heparin group; risk ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 1.05; P=0.11), and mortality was 2.3 percent, as compared with 3.6 percent in the heparin group (P=0.02). Major bleeding occurred in 0.4 percent of the patients in both groups. Reversible thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently with tirofiban than with heparin (1.1 percent vs. 0.4 percent, P=0.04).

Conclusions Tirofiban was generally well tolerated and, as compared with heparin, reduced ischemic events during the 48-hour infusion period, during which revascularization procedures were not performed. The incidence of refractory ischemia and myocardial infarction was not reduced at 30 days, but mortality was lower among the patients given tirofiban. Platelet inhibition with aspirin plus tirofiban may have a role in the management of unstable angina.


Source Information

Address reprint requests to Professor Harvey White at the Cardiology Department, Green Lane Hospital, Private Bag 92 189, Auckland 1030, New Zealand.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Tirofiban in Unstable Coronary Disease
Liron M., Théroux P., White H. D., The PRISM Study Investigators , Chesebro J. H., Badimon J. J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1163-1165, Oct 15, 1998. Correspondence

Management of Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction
Bedell S. E., Graboys T. B., Ravid S., Thompson R. C., Roe M. T., Bowen T. E., Topol E. J., Huitink J. M., Bax J. J., Boden W. E., O'Rourke R. A., Crawford M. H.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1395-1398, Nov 5, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.