The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 338:1565-1571 May 28, 1998 Number 22
NextNext

Nonoccupational Exposure to Chrysotile Asbestos and the Risk of Lung Cancer
Michel Camus, Ph.D., Jack Siemiatycki, Ph.D., and Bette Meek, M.Sc.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Landrigan, P. J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Heavy industrial exposure to asbestos causes lung cancer and mesothelioma, but it remains unknown whether much lower environmental exposure to asbestos also causes these cancers. Nevertheless, regulatory agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have assessed the risk of lung cancer by extrapolating known risks from past industrial exposure to asbestos to today's much lower environmental asbestos levels (roughly 100,000 times lower). We also tested the EPA's model for predicting the risk of asbestos-induced lung cancer in a population of women with relatively high levels of nonoccupational exposure to asbestos.

Methods Mortality among women in 2 chrysotile-asbestos–mining areas of the province of Quebec was compared with mortality among women in 60 control areas, and age-standardized mortality ratios were derived. With the help of an expert panel, we estimated past exposure to asbestos among women in the mining areas and used these data with the EPA's model to predict the relative risk of lung cancer. We then compared this prediction with the observed mortality ratios.

Results On the basis of the estimated exposure in the asbestos-mining areas, a relative risk of death due to lung cancer of 2.1 was predicted by the EPA's model, amounting to about 75 excess deaths from lung cancer in this population. By contrast, we calculated a standardized mortality ratio of 1.0 and a standardized proportionate mortality ratio of 1.1 (P>0.05), suggesting that there were between 0 and 6.5 excess deaths from lung cancer among the women with nonoccupational exposure to asbestos. Seven deaths from pleural cancer were observed (relative risk, 7.63; P<0.05).

Conclusions We found no measurable excess risk of death due to lung cancer among women in two chrysotile-asbestos–mining regions. The EPA's model overestimated the risk of asbestos-induced lung cancer by at least a factor of 10.


Source Information

From the Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institut Armand-Frappier, University of Quebec, Laval, Que. (M.C., J.S.); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal (M.C., J.S.); and the Environmental Health Center, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ont. (M.C., B.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Camus at the Institut Armand-Frappier, 531 Boul. des Prairies, Laval, QC H7V 4Z3, Canada.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Nonoccupational Exposure to Chrysotile Asbestos and the Risk of Lung Cancer
Churg A., Demiroglu H., Sokas R. K., Costas E., Garrido A., Goyanes V. J., Langer A. M., Case B. W., Morgan R. W., Goodman M., Camus M., Siemiatycki J., Landrigan P. J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 339:999-1002, Oct 1, 1998. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.